"Of all possible sexual perversions, religion is the only one to have ever been scientifically systematized"

Louis Aragon's quote, "Of all possible sexual perversions, religious beliefs is the just one to have ever been clinically systematized", emerges from a provocative interplay between the notions of religious beliefs and sexual perversion, provided in a stark and unsettling light. This declaration seems to recommend that religious beliefs, like a sexual perversion, is a discrepancy from a 'normative' state, however unlike any other perversion, it has actually been arranged and examined in a methodical, scientific way.

To unload this, we need to check out the metaphorical language Aragon is using. By equating faith with sexual perversion, he is engaging in an intentional act of disobedience, challenging conventional views on both faith and morality. In many cultures, religious beliefs is often viewed as a pillar of moral and social guidance, while sexual perversions are normally damned or marginalized. Aragon's juxtaposition recommends a review of religion itself as a possible deviation from a more 'natural' human state or understanding.

The notion that religion has been "clinically systematized" refers to how religious practices and beliefs have been inspected, categorized, and taken a look at in a systematic way, much like clinical questions. This systematization indicates an organized attempt to understand, implement, and in some cases make use of religious teaching, therefore creating class structure and social norms that can assist or control social habits. By aligning this procedure with the study of perversions, Aragon might be highlighting the ways religion has been used to confirm habits or beliefs that may otherwise be considered unnatural or deviant.

Furthermore, this quote can be translated as a review of how spiritual teachings frequently put in control over human sexuality and individual flexibility, controling what is deemed appropriate. By equating spiritual teaching to a perversion, Aragon may be exposing the concept that the ethical judgments enforced by religion are, in themselves, a kind of deviance from essential humanity.

In essence, Aragon is offering a controversial and important view of how religion as an institution functions, welcoming the reader to reconsider assumptions about the functions of faith and ethical assistance in society.