"Of course the French are making very credible movies and it is still one of the greatest nations in terms of world cinema but the real problem is the decay in film criticism"

In this quote, Wim Wenders, a popular filmmaker known for his substantial contributions to movie theater, acknowledges the long-lasting prowess of French cinema while raising concerns about the existing state of film criticism. Wenders asserts that France remains a significant force in the worldwide movie industry, producing high-quality and reputable films. This lines up with the historic story where French movie theater has actually long been commemorated for its ingenious contributions, including the French New Wave movement and directors like Jean-Luc Godard and François Truffaut, who have left an enduring mark on film history.

Nevertheless, Wenders shifts focus to what he views as a more pressing concern: the decay in movie criticism. This declaration suggests a decline in the quality, depth, and influence of contemporary film criticism. Traditionally, film critics play an important role in bridging the space in between filmmakers and audiences, offering insights, analyses, and assessments that help shape public understanding and gratitude of movie theater. Critics like Roger Ebert and Pauline Kael have been instrumental in guiding audiences and raising movie discourse.

The "decay" Wenders refers to could be attributed to several aspects. Initially, the increase of digital platforms and social media has democratized criticism, permitting anybody with a web connection to voice their opinion. While this has actually broadened the spectrum of voices, it also suggests that nuanced and informed critique might be overshadowed by surface-level reviews and rankings. Furthermore, there might be a shift towards content that focuses on home entertainment over in-depth analysis, as much shorter attention spans and the demand for fast consumption grow in the digital age.

Wenders' comment invites reflection on how the development of media consumption impacts our understanding and appreciation of movie theater. It underscores the need for a robust and thoughtful crucial structure that supports the art form's stability, making it possible for both filmmakers and audiences to engage with movies on a deeper level. In essence, while celebrating French movie theater's artistic vitality, Wenders requires a renaissance in movie criticism to match it.