"Once I should have been, if not satisfied, partially, at least, contented with suffrage for the intelligent and those who have been soldiers; now I am convinced that universal suffrage is demanded by sound policy and impartial justice"

In this quote, Salmon P. Chase reflects on his evolving viewpoint relating to suffrage, or the right to vote. Initially, Chase admits to a more conservative perspective, where he would have been at least partly content with limiting suffrage to specific groups: the "smart" and those who have actually worked as "soldiers." This viewpoint might have come from a belief that voters needed a certain level of education or a demonstration of civic commitment through military service to make educated electoral choices. Such a view was not uncommon in the 19th century, a duration when debates about extending suffrage rights, especially in the context of the post-Civil War United States, were extreme.

Nevertheless, the crux of the quote depends on the transformative shift in Chase's stance. He acknowledges a modification in his understanding by specifying that he is now "persuaded that universal suffrage is required by sound policy and objective justice." This reveals a more inclusive and democratic philosophy, suggesting that Chase has pertained to see universal suffrage as not only an ethical important however likewise one that lines up with practical governance.

"Sound policy" suggests that extending voting rights to everyone would lead to much better governance, likely due to the fact that decisions that impact the whole population must be made by representatives picked by the entire population. "Impartial justice," on the other hand, reflects a commitment to equality and the belief that every person, regardless of intelligence, occupation, or other criteria, deserves an equivalent voice in the democratic procedure.

Chase's advancement reflects wider societal changes and the push for civil liberties during the Reconstruction age in America. His advocacy for universal suffrage recommends a vision of democracy that is based on inclusivity and equality, preparing for future battles for expanded civil rights. In essence, Chase is acknowledging that a simply society can not deny people involvement in the governance processes that affect their lives.