"One thing governors feel, Democrats and Republicans alike, is that we have a health care system that, if you're on Medicaid, you have unlimited access to health care, at unlimited levels, at no cost. No wonder it's running away"
About this Quote
Mike Huckabee, speaking as a former governor responsible for balancing a state budget, channels a bipartisan anxiety about Medicaid. The program is a joint federal-state entitlement that expands when economies falter and health needs rise, and its costs take a growing share of state spending. From that vantage point, Medicaid can feel open-ended: if someone qualifies, the state must pay its share of covered services, and the federal government matches the rest. That demand-driven design makes costs seem as if they are running away.
The language of unlimited access at no cost, though, is more rhetorical than literal. Medicaid has strict eligibility rules, defined benefits, prior authorization, and heavy reliance on managed care. Many adults face small copays; provider networks are limited because reimbursement rates are relatively low; and there are waiting lists for some long-term services. The absence of a price tag at the point of care can raise utilization, but most Medicaid spending is concentrated among people with disabilities, seniors needing long-term care, and individuals with serious chronic conditions. The image of casual overuse misses where the dollars actually go.
Huckabees framing hints at moral hazard and the structural incentives of an open-ended federal match. Governors of both parties have tried to rein in growth with managed care, value-based payments, stricter utilization review, preferred drug lists, and targeted cost sharing. Federal debates have floated block grants or per-capita caps to impose firm limits, which would shift more risk to states and potentially reduce coverage or services when costs spike.
The line captures a real political tension: the promise of broad access for low-income people versus the pressure to control public spending. It collapses complex realities into a sound bite, turning an entitlement to defined benefits into a caricature of limitless care, and understates the barriers many Medicaid patients still face even as the program is blamed for excess.
The language of unlimited access at no cost, though, is more rhetorical than literal. Medicaid has strict eligibility rules, defined benefits, prior authorization, and heavy reliance on managed care. Many adults face small copays; provider networks are limited because reimbursement rates are relatively low; and there are waiting lists for some long-term services. The absence of a price tag at the point of care can raise utilization, but most Medicaid spending is concentrated among people with disabilities, seniors needing long-term care, and individuals with serious chronic conditions. The image of casual overuse misses where the dollars actually go.
Huckabees framing hints at moral hazard and the structural incentives of an open-ended federal match. Governors of both parties have tried to rein in growth with managed care, value-based payments, stricter utilization review, preferred drug lists, and targeted cost sharing. Federal debates have floated block grants or per-capita caps to impose firm limits, which would shift more risk to states and potentially reduce coverage or services when costs spike.
The line captures a real political tension: the promise of broad access for low-income people versus the pressure to control public spending. It collapses complex realities into a sound bite, turning an entitlement to defined benefits into a caricature of limitless care, and understates the barriers many Medicaid patients still face even as the program is blamed for excess.
Quote Details
| Topic | Health |
|---|
More Quotes by Mike
Add to List
