"People who play conventional music are threatened by electronica and don't consider it to be as valuable as what they do"
About this Quote
Bill Laswell's quote discuss the vibrant and frequently contentious relationship in between standard and electronic music communities. This dichotomy reflects wider themes of development, adjustment, and the human tendency to withstand change.
Firstly, traditional artists-- those grounded in standard instruments and classical types-- often view their craft as needing extensive strategy and training. The musicianship associated with playing instruments like the violin, guitar, or piano is normally considered as a discipline that requires years of practice to master. By contrast, electronic music, which can be produced with digital tools and software, is often viewed as requiring less technical skill, resulting in the perception that it might lack depth or genuine musicianship. Laswell recommends that this perception threatens traditional artists, possibly due to the fact that it challenges the idea that devotion to conventional strategies is the only path to producing high-quality music.
Laswell's usage of the word "threatened" suggests a psychological action rooted in a fear of obsolescence or the decline of custom. The increase of electronic music might signify a shift in popular taste and cultural values, potentially leaving conventional musicians feeling sidelined. This fear of being eclipsed can reproduce defensiveness, manifesting as an unwillingness to acknowledge the artistic merit of electronic music.
Additionally, Laswell's quote highlights continuous cultural and generational tensions within the music industry. As every generation encounters brand-new technologies and forms of expression, older approaches are often questioned or undermined. Regardless of this, electronic music has carved out its own area, progressing into categories that are both innovative and reflective of contemporary technological landscapes.
Ultimately, Laswell's declaration encourages introspection about the value we designate to various kinds of creativity and the predispositions that may accompany these judgments. It functions as a pointer that innovation does not naturally reduce custom, but rather, can coexist and even add to a richer, more diverse musical ecosystem.
More details
About the Author