"Physics is becoming so unbelievably complex that it is taking longer and longer to train a physicist. It is taking so long, in fact, to train a physicist to the place where he understands the nature of physical problems that he is already too old to solve them"

Eugene Wigner's quote highlights a concern about the progressing nature of the field of physics, stressing the increasing complexity of the discipline and its implications for those who pursue it. In essence, Wigner is mentioning 2 main concerns: the elaborate nature of modern-day physics and the impact of that intricacy on the development and efficiency of physicists.

First of all, the quote recommends that the field of physics has become extremely complex. The foundational theories and principles, along with the sheer volume of understanding built up throughout the years, need comprehensive education and training. As new discoveries are made, they build on or challenge existing knowledge, demanding a much deeper understanding and broader knowledge from those getting in the field. This complexity might come from developments in innovation, the development of brand-new theoretical structures, and the interdisciplinary nature of modern-day clinical research, which frequently needs know-how in numerous locations.

Second of all, Wigner comments on the time it takes to train physicists to the point where they can truly comprehend the nature of physical problems. This lengthy educational journey can leave them in a position where, only upon reaching complete preparedness to contribute meaningfully to the field, they may find themselves currently in the later stages of their careers. Wigner implies that younger minds, which frequently bring fresh point of views and innovative concepts, might be more proficient at tackling such detailed issues. Nevertheless, by the time these new physicists totally understand the complexities of their field, they might have passed their most creative and prolific years.

In summary, Wigner's observation is both a reflection on the nature of development in physics and a review of how such development effects clinical inquiry. It raises questions about how the clinical community may attend to and adjust to these difficulties, possibly by rethinking educational methods or motivating earlier specialization, to make sure that physicists remain at the peak of their analytical capabilities when they are best placed to make substantial contributions.