"Politics, as a practice, whatever its professions, has always been the systematic organization of hatreds"
About this Quote
Adams isn’t describing politics at its best; he’s stripping it down to its most reliable engine: division that can be managed, weaponized, and turned into power. The sting is in the phrase “whatever its professions.” Politics will always dress itself in high-minded language - liberty, order, reform, tradition - because virtue is the camouflage that makes coercion feel like consent. Adams, a historian who watched America’s Gilded Age harden into a machine of patronage, industrial wealth, and mass persuasion, is writing with the cool disappointment of someone who has seen ideals repeatedly routed through institutions built for winning.
“Systematic organization” is the tell. Hatred, on its own, is messy and personal; politics professionalizes it. Parties, newspapers, rallies, even slogans become bureaucracies of emotion, taking diffuse anxiety and giving it targets, categories, and scripts. The line implies that political identity is less about what we love than whom we’re taught to loathe - and that this instruction can be remarkably efficient. It’s not the spontaneous riot Adams fears; it’s the disciplined coalition assembled by shared enemies.
The subtext is almost bleaker: hatred isn’t a glitch in democratic life, it’s a feature that scales. In an era when “the people” was becoming a mass public, mediated by print and patronage, Adams anticipates modern polarization: politics as branding, grievance as glue, moral language as marketing. His historian’s cynicism lands because it refuses the comforting myth that better rhetoric will fix a structure designed to convert resentment into results.
“Systematic organization” is the tell. Hatred, on its own, is messy and personal; politics professionalizes it. Parties, newspapers, rallies, even slogans become bureaucracies of emotion, taking diffuse anxiety and giving it targets, categories, and scripts. The line implies that political identity is less about what we love than whom we’re taught to loathe - and that this instruction can be remarkably efficient. It’s not the spontaneous riot Adams fears; it’s the disciplined coalition assembled by shared enemies.
The subtext is almost bleaker: hatred isn’t a glitch in democratic life, it’s a feature that scales. In an era when “the people” was becoming a mass public, mediated by print and patronage, Adams anticipates modern polarization: politics as branding, grievance as glue, moral language as marketing. His historian’s cynicism lands because it refuses the comforting myth that better rhetoric will fix a structure designed to convert resentment into results.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Henry Adams (Henry Brooks Adams), The Education of Henry Adams (1918). Contains the passage commonly cited as: "Politics, as a practice, whatever its professions, has always been the systematic organization of hatreds." |
More Quotes by Henry
Add to List






