"President Bush remained undeterred by the massive display of American opposition, even though much of it came from the hundreds of thousands of voters who supported him by voting for Nader"

The quote by Jon Stewart is a commentary on President Bush's stance in spite of considerable public opposition, with a concentrate on the political characteristics throughout that period. To unpack this, let's consider the context and implications.

The reference of "the massive display screen of American opposition" most likely refers to prevalent demonstrations and public dissent against particular policies or actions taken by President Bush's administration. During his tenure, Bush dealt with significant opposition, particularly concerning the Iraq War, environmental policies, and other geopolitical choices. The protests and public outcry were substantial in size and strength, showing considerable disapproval from various sections of the American population.

The latter part of the quote, "despite the fact that much of it came from the numerous countless voters who supported him by voting for Nader", presents an intriguing political nuance. Ralph Nader, a popular consumer supporter, and political activist, ran as a third-party candidate in the governmental elections, most especially in 2000. His candidacy was controversial, particularly among Democrats, as many believed that Nader's presence in the race siphoned votes away from Democratic prospect Al Gore, accidentally aiding Bush's triumph.

Stewart's declaration suggests a perceived irony or unforeseen political positioning. Although Nader was not a Bush supporter, a few of his citizens might have contributed to Bush's electoral success by not electing the Democrat, hence indirectly impacting the election result. The quote highlights this irony: people whose ballot decisions inadvertently helped Bush attain office were now part of the opposition against his policies.

The wider ramification is a review of the intricacies within the American electoral procedure and voter habits, showing how political results can often diverge from citizen objectives. By mentioning Nader's citizens specifically, Stewart underscores the unintentional repercussions of tactical ballot and the in some cases convoluted nature of political support and opposition in a two-party system.