"Roman civilization had achieved, within the bounds of its technology, relatively as great a mastery of time and space as we have achieved today"

Arthur Erickson's quote suggests a contrast between the technological accomplishments of ancient Roman civilization and those of modern society, focusing on their control in time and area. Erickson is not literally corresponding Roman technology with modern innovation; rather, he stresses the relative proficiency each civilization attained over their respective worlds in terms of interaction, transportation, and control.

In Roman times, technological developments such as the substantial network of roads, aqueducts, and the organization of the Pax Romana greatly facilitated motion and connectivity throughout large ranges. The Roman roadway system, for example, while primitive by today's requirements, was revolutionary at the time. It allowed effective military mobilization, trade, and interaction throughout the empire, effectively shrinking the world for its people and working out control over space.

Furthermore, the Romans mastered architectural and engineering tasks, such as the building and construction of bridges, amphitheaters, and huge structures like the Colosseum and Pantheon, which showcased their command over the spatial environments they occupied. Time management also evolved with practices such as the Julian calendar, which standardized timekeeping throughout the empire and showed a sophisticated understanding of temporal company.

Relatively, modern-day society uses sophisticated technology to transcend physical restrictions through digital interaction, high-speed travel, and global positioning systems, permitting us to connect instantly throughout continents. Sophisticated metropolitan preparation and facilities make it possible for effective motion within and in between contemporary cities, reflecting our modern proficiency over area.

Erickson's statement highlights that both civilizations, within the scope of their respective technological contexts, attained significant control with time and area. This contrast welcomes reflection on the human capability to innovate and adjust, highlighting a continuum of technological improvement that persists in looking for to get rid of the restrictions enforced by time and geography. It emphasizes the idea that while the tools and scales vary, the underlying human ambition and resourcefulness remain constant throughout history.