"She had called in the debt that parents owe a child for bringing her, unasked, into a strange world. One should never make an offer without knowing full well what will happen if it is accepted"

David Brin's quote touches on profound themes related to obligation, existentialism, and the parent-child relationship. When he states, "She had employed the financial obligation that parents owe a child for bringing her, unasked, into an odd world", he is highlighting an essential ethical consideration: the inherent duties that moms and dads have toward their children. A child does not choose to be born; hence, moms and dads bear an ethical commitment to offer care, guidance, and assistance, helping their child navigate the intricacies of life. This expression suggests that the speaker, probably an offspring, is looking for to declare what is rightfully theirs-- a nurturing and helpful childhood-- as a "financial obligation" owed by the parents for bringing them into presence without prior consent.

The following sentence, "One ought to never ever make an offer without knowing complete well what will happen if it is accepted", strengthens this idea of foresight and obligation. It recommends that decisions, especially those with significant consequences, should not be made lightly. In the context of parenting, deciding to have a kid belongs to making an offer; it implies a promise to satisfy certain responsibilities. Before choosing to bring a kid into the world, individuals need to ponder the lifelong obligations and difficulties that featured parenting. This cautionary message highlights the importance of awareness and preparation when making considerable life options.

Together, these two sentences review the often-unexamined decision to have kids and emphasize the extensive ramifications of such a choice. Brin encourages reflection on the duties that include being a parent and the ethical factors to consider of bringing a brand-new life into an unforeseeable and "weird world". Through this lens, the quote works as both a commentary on familial responsibilities and a more comprehensive philosophical musing on the nature of presence and authorization.