"Since every man desires happiness, it is evidently no small matter whether he conceives of happiness in terms of work or of enjoyment"
About this Quote
Happiness is not a neutral ideal but a guiding image that shapes a life. If happiness is imagined as enjoyment, the good life becomes a sequence of pleasures, satisfactions, and comforts to be collected and protected. If it is imagined as work, the good life becomes an ongoing activity requiring effort, discipline, and the steady exercise of the will. The distinction quietly reroutes everything: how we educate children, what we expect of citizenship, how we evaluate success, and how we endure inevitable hardship.
Irving Babbitt, a leading figure of New Humanism, distrusted the romantic confidence that natural impulse, left free, would find its own harmony. He argued for a formative, classical idea of character: the self is made through constraint, not indulgence; through the work of self-mastery, not the pursuit of more agreeable sensations. He did not glorify drudgery or deny the legitimacy of pleasure. Rather, he insisted that the deepest satisfactions arise when pleasure is ordered by purpose. The joy that follows a demanding task completed well is not the same as the thrill of consumption; it anchors the person differently, because it grows out of what one has become, not what one has acquired.
Conceiving happiness as enjoyment invites a politics of entitlement and a culture of distraction, forever chasing novelty and ever more refined comforts. Conceiving it as work invites a politics of responsibility and a culture of excellence, where institutions cultivate judgment and self-control. The first image makes freedom a freedom to feel; the second makes freedom a freedom to act well.
Aristotle called happiness an activity of the soul in accordance with virtue. Babbitt, speaking to a modern age tempted by the utopia of appetite, recasts that wisdom. The choice of ideal determines the habits we train, the leaders we admire, and the resilience we possess when fortune turns. It is no small matter because it decides whether life becomes a feast of moments or a vocation.
Irving Babbitt, a leading figure of New Humanism, distrusted the romantic confidence that natural impulse, left free, would find its own harmony. He argued for a formative, classical idea of character: the self is made through constraint, not indulgence; through the work of self-mastery, not the pursuit of more agreeable sensations. He did not glorify drudgery or deny the legitimacy of pleasure. Rather, he insisted that the deepest satisfactions arise when pleasure is ordered by purpose. The joy that follows a demanding task completed well is not the same as the thrill of consumption; it anchors the person differently, because it grows out of what one has become, not what one has acquired.
Conceiving happiness as enjoyment invites a politics of entitlement and a culture of distraction, forever chasing novelty and ever more refined comforts. Conceiving it as work invites a politics of responsibility and a culture of excellence, where institutions cultivate judgment and self-control. The first image makes freedom a freedom to feel; the second makes freedom a freedom to act well.
Aristotle called happiness an activity of the soul in accordance with virtue. Babbitt, speaking to a modern age tempted by the utopia of appetite, recasts that wisdom. The choice of ideal determines the habits we train, the leaders we admire, and the resilience we possess when fortune turns. It is no small matter because it decides whether life becomes a feast of moments or a vocation.
Quote Details
| Topic | Happiness |
|---|
More Quotes by Irving
Add to List








