"So to recap: we may or may not be going to war with Iraq because Saddam may or may not have weapons of mass destruction, which he may or may not use, or pass to other terrorists groups with whom he may or may not have links"
About this Quote
Bremner’s punchline is built like a bureaucratic memo that’s been left out in the rain: everything smears into “may or may not,” until the case for war reads less like policy than like nervous throat-clearing. The comedic intent isn’t to deny risk, but to expose how power launders uncertainty into inevitability. By “recapping” the argument in one breathless sentence, he turns the rhetorical architecture of the early-2000s Iraq debate into farce: a chain of hypotheticals presented as a firm mandate.
The subtext is corrosive and precise. Each clause widens the gap between what’s known and what’s asserted, and the repetition functions like a drumbeat of doubt. It mimics the hedged language of intelligence briefings and press conferences, then holds it up to daylight where it looks absurd. Bremner isn’t arguing details about Saddam; he’s indicting the emotional mechanism of the moment: fear as a solvent that dissolves standards of evidence. When every premise is conditional, the “logic” of action becomes a mood rather than a conclusion.
Context matters: this lands in the pre-invasion climate when WMD claims, alleged terrorist links, and “imminent threat” rhetoric were constantly rehearsed in UK and US media. Satire becomes a form of public auditing. Bremner’s sentence performs what official language tried not to: it tallies the uncertainties out loud, and in doing so, suggests the real agenda is happening offstage. The joke’s bite is that it doesn’t exaggerate; it simply repeats the argument at normal speed until it collapses under its own qualifiers.
The subtext is corrosive and precise. Each clause widens the gap between what’s known and what’s asserted, and the repetition functions like a drumbeat of doubt. It mimics the hedged language of intelligence briefings and press conferences, then holds it up to daylight where it looks absurd. Bremner isn’t arguing details about Saddam; he’s indicting the emotional mechanism of the moment: fear as a solvent that dissolves standards of evidence. When every premise is conditional, the “logic” of action becomes a mood rather than a conclusion.
Context matters: this lands in the pre-invasion climate when WMD claims, alleged terrorist links, and “imminent threat” rhetoric were constantly rehearsed in UK and US media. Satire becomes a form of public auditing. Bremner’s sentence performs what official language tried not to: it tallies the uncertainties out loud, and in doing so, suggests the real agenda is happening offstage. The joke’s bite is that it doesn’t exaggerate; it simply repeats the argument at normal speed until it collapses under its own qualifiers.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Rory
Add to List
