"So to that extent that was a very sharp reminder a few months out from the election that we weren't performing in the eyes of the public to the level that they wanted if they were going to re-elect us. So we went out and were much more upfront on issues"
About this Quote
Bolger’s phrasing has the clipped, managerial candor of a politician describing a scare, not a revelation. “A very sharp reminder” is euphemism doing heavy lifting: something went wrong - polling, a by-election jolt, a media cycle - and it punctured the comforting bubble that incumbents tend to live in. The sentence keeps agency deliberately vague (“we weren’t performing in the eyes of the public”), as if “performance” were a neutral metric rather than the lived consequences of policy. That’s the point. It reframes governance as a contract renewal: deliver outcomes and optics that meet expectations, or lose the job.
The subtext is a portrait of late-stage incumbency, where legitimacy depends less on ideological coherence than on perceived competence. Bolger isn’t confessing error so much as acknowledging a feedback mechanism. “If they were going to re-elect us” is almost clinical, but it carries the real threat: power is contingent, and voters are the only bosses that matter when the calendar tightens.
Then comes the pivot: “So we went out and were much more upfront on issues.” It’s a tacit admission that they hadn’t been. “Upfront” signals a strategic recalibration - more direct messaging, fewer evasions, a controlled burst of transparency calibrated for election season. The context is democratic accountability, but the intent is survival: not just to govern better, but to look like a government that deserves another term.
The subtext is a portrait of late-stage incumbency, where legitimacy depends less on ideological coherence than on perceived competence. Bolger isn’t confessing error so much as acknowledging a feedback mechanism. “If they were going to re-elect us” is almost clinical, but it carries the real threat: power is contingent, and voters are the only bosses that matter when the calendar tightens.
Then comes the pivot: “So we went out and were much more upfront on issues.” It’s a tacit admission that they hadn’t been. “Upfront” signals a strategic recalibration - more direct messaging, fewer evasions, a controlled burst of transparency calibrated for election season. The context is democratic accountability, but the intent is survival: not just to govern better, but to look like a government that deserves another term.
Quote Details
| Topic | Vision & Strategy |
|---|
More Quotes by Jim
Add to List

