"Sometimes in my class I have people come in and do monologues inspired by people they know and I always find that to be useful to do specifics about somebody and then you're actually doing a character and not doing some random old lady or something"
About this Quote
Poehler is smuggling a serious craft lesson into casual, classroom talk: specificity is the difference between a character and a costume. The throwaway phrasing - "some random old lady or something" - is doing work. It punctures the lazy default of sketch comedy, where "old lady" becomes a bundle of preloaded tics (a voice, a hunch, a handbag, a punchline) that flatters the performer more than it reveals anything human. She’s calling out impersonation-by-vibe: broad, recyclable, and ultimately empty.
Her teaching move is simple and a little ruthless: anchor a monologue in someone you actually know. Not a celebrity impression, not a generic archetype, but a person with contradictions and habits you can’t invent from thin air. When you build from specifics - the way someone corrects you, the odd kindness that follows a cutting remark, the unnecessary detail they always include - you’re forced into empathy and observation. The joke can still land, but it lands on something true rather than on a demographic.
There’s subtext here about ethics, too. Comedy has a long history of mining "types" that map neatly onto stereotypes, especially around age and gender. By pushing students toward real models, Poehler nudges them away from cheap signals and toward textured choices: what the character wants, what they’re avoiding, what they think they sound like versus how they actually sound. It’s also a method for originality in an algorithmic era: specifics don’t trend, they stick.
Her teaching move is simple and a little ruthless: anchor a monologue in someone you actually know. Not a celebrity impression, not a generic archetype, but a person with contradictions and habits you can’t invent from thin air. When you build from specifics - the way someone corrects you, the odd kindness that follows a cutting remark, the unnecessary detail they always include - you’re forced into empathy and observation. The joke can still land, but it lands on something true rather than on a demographic.
There’s subtext here about ethics, too. Comedy has a long history of mining "types" that map neatly onto stereotypes, especially around age and gender. By pushing students toward real models, Poehler nudges them away from cheap signals and toward textured choices: what the character wants, what they’re avoiding, what they think they sound like versus how they actually sound. It’s also a method for originality in an algorithmic era: specifics don’t trend, they stick.
Quote Details
| Topic | Teaching |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Amy
Add to List



