"Technology is a useful servant but a dangerous master"
About this Quote
The line lands like a warning label on modernity: don’t confuse convenience with control. Lange’s “useful servant” frames technology as an instrument, something meant to extend human agency. The snap comes with “dangerous master,” a phrase that doesn’t demonize machines so much as indict the human habit of surrendering judgment to whatever seems efficient, inevitable, or new.
As a politician writing in the early 20th century, Lange wasn’t speculating from a sci-fi perch. He lived through an era when industrial systems, mass communications, and mechanized warfare were reshaping daily life and state power at once. In that context, “master” isn’t metaphorical fluff; it’s a political category. Technologies don’t merely help individuals; they reorganize institutions, reward certain forms of authority, and make some choices feel non-negotiable. When the tool becomes the master, governance turns reactive: policy follows the machine’s logic, not the public’s.
The subtext is about responsibility and moral latency. Servants can be commanded; masters demand obedience. Lange is pointing at the subtle shift from using technology to justify our actions (“the system requires it,” “the algorithm decided,” “progress can’t be stopped”). That’s how accountability evaporates: not through malicious robots, but through humans laundering decisions through technical necessity.
The quote works because it’s compact, hierarchical, and bluntly ethical. It insists that the central question isn’t what technology can do, but who gets to steer, who pays the costs, and how easily “innovation” becomes an excuse to stop choosing.
As a politician writing in the early 20th century, Lange wasn’t speculating from a sci-fi perch. He lived through an era when industrial systems, mass communications, and mechanized warfare were reshaping daily life and state power at once. In that context, “master” isn’t metaphorical fluff; it’s a political category. Technologies don’t merely help individuals; they reorganize institutions, reward certain forms of authority, and make some choices feel non-negotiable. When the tool becomes the master, governance turns reactive: policy follows the machine’s logic, not the public’s.
The subtext is about responsibility and moral latency. Servants can be commanded; masters demand obedience. Lange is pointing at the subtle shift from using technology to justify our actions (“the system requires it,” “the algorithm decided,” “progress can’t be stopped”). That’s how accountability evaporates: not through malicious robots, but through humans laundering decisions through technical necessity.
The quote works because it’s compact, hierarchical, and bluntly ethical. It insists that the central question isn’t what technology can do, but who gets to steer, who pays the costs, and how easily “innovation” becomes an excuse to stop choosing.
Quote Details
| Topic | Technology |
|---|---|
| Source | Rejected source: Histoire de l'internationalisme (Lange, Christian Lous, 1869-1938,Scho..., 1919)IA: histoiredelinter00languoft
Evidence: re envers leurs ennemis ils ne se servent de lautorité et du secours du magistra Other candidates (2) Technology (Christian Lous Lange) compilation97.8% hock 1970 technology is a useful servant but a dangerous master wchristian lous The Palgrave Handbook of Popular Culture as Philosophy (Dean A. Kowalski, Chris Lay, Kimberly..., 2024) compilation95.0% ... Technology is a useful servant but a dangerous master . -Christian Lous Lange When the Norwegian historian and di... |
More Quotes by Christian
Add to List







