"That's the problem with news interviews, you work your tail off to get prominent figures in the news on the radio, but once they've been on, the event passes, the urgency, the issues you talked about evaporate"
About this Quote
Bob Edwards captures the paradox of daily news interviews: weeks of booking, research, and pre-interviews, only to produce a fleeting segment that vanishes with the next headline. As a longtime host of NPRs Morning Edition, he understood the rhythms of commute-time radio, built on timeliness and brevity. The complaint is not about the work, but about the mediums relationship to time: an interview can be rigorous and revealing, yet its impact is shaped by the relentless turnover of the news cycle.
Prominent figures know that too. They can endure a tough five-minute exchange, confident that by tomorrow the caravan moves on. The urgency that animates the questions is a product of the days news peg; once the peg is gone, the issues lose traction in public attention, not because they are solved but because they no longer feel new. This dynamic rewards message control and punishes complexity. Structural problems demand sustained scrutiny, but the format privileges novelty over follow-through.
Edwards points to an institutional responsibility as well. Journalists can book the big guest, but the harder task is building continuity: revisiting the same subject after the cameras pivot elsewhere, connecting episodes into a narrative that keeps pressure on power. Radios intimacy intensifies the sense of immediacy, yet the audio disappears into the air unless editors and audiences insist on returning to the themes that matter.
The lament is also a warning about attention as a public resource. When urgency evaporates, accountability evaporates with it. The craft of interviewing remains essential, but its civic value depends on what happens after the segment ends: whether newsrooms commit to follow-up, whether listeners remember, and whether the next news cycle is allowed to erase the last.
Prominent figures know that too. They can endure a tough five-minute exchange, confident that by tomorrow the caravan moves on. The urgency that animates the questions is a product of the days news peg; once the peg is gone, the issues lose traction in public attention, not because they are solved but because they no longer feel new. This dynamic rewards message control and punishes complexity. Structural problems demand sustained scrutiny, but the format privileges novelty over follow-through.
Edwards points to an institutional responsibility as well. Journalists can book the big guest, but the harder task is building continuity: revisiting the same subject after the cameras pivot elsewhere, connecting episodes into a narrative that keeps pressure on power. Radios intimacy intensifies the sense of immediacy, yet the audio disappears into the air unless editors and audiences insist on returning to the themes that matter.
The lament is also a warning about attention as a public resource. When urgency evaporates, accountability evaporates with it. The craft of interviewing remains essential, but its civic value depends on what happens after the segment ends: whether newsrooms commit to follow-up, whether listeners remember, and whether the next news cycle is allowed to erase the last.
Quote Details
| Topic | Time |
|---|
More Quotes by Bob
Add to List
