"The biggest challenge for everybody to realize out there is that we're in a very complicated business world and that were all under one umbrella and it's very challenging for everybody to figure out where the priorities lie and where the loyalties lie"
About this Quote
Bakula puts a finger on a modern tension: consolidation has knit sprawling enterprises into single umbrellas, while multiplying the stakeholders each decision must satisfy. When companies merge, brands converge, and platforms integrate, the lines of authority blur. People answer to the project, the department, the parent company, the shareholders, the audience, and their own ethics all at once. That tangle makes even simple choices feel fraught, because every choice is implicitly a trade between competing goods.
Coming from an actor who has led television ensembles and navigated networks, studios, streamers, unions, and fan communities, the point carries industry-specific weight. In entertainment, a show may serve a franchise strategy, a quarterly revenue target, a platform growth metric, and a creative vision simultaneously. When those aims diverge, where does loyalty sit? With the script and the crew that made it possible, with the executives funding and distributing it, or with the audience whose trust sustains the whole ecosystem? The answer shifts project by project, and that volatility is the challenge.
The observation also travels well beyond Hollywood. Matrixed organizations generate dotted-line allegiances that collide under deadline pressure. Teams are told to move fast and innovate while guarding brand risk and maintaining compliance. Individuals are urged to be loyal, yet restructurings and pivots can reorder priorities overnight. Without explicit guidance, people default to local loyalties, and collaboration fragments.
The remedy implied is not to demand purer loyalty but to clarify the hierarchy of priorities and to make the reasons visible. Leaders owe teams a crisp articulation of what comes first this quarter, this launch, this crisis, and what values are nonnegotiable. Individuals, in turn, can practice transparent commitment: naming their obligations, disclosing conflicts, and raising misalignments early. In a world under one umbrella, loyalty becomes less about pledging to a silo and more about stewarding trust across the whole system.
Coming from an actor who has led television ensembles and navigated networks, studios, streamers, unions, and fan communities, the point carries industry-specific weight. In entertainment, a show may serve a franchise strategy, a quarterly revenue target, a platform growth metric, and a creative vision simultaneously. When those aims diverge, where does loyalty sit? With the script and the crew that made it possible, with the executives funding and distributing it, or with the audience whose trust sustains the whole ecosystem? The answer shifts project by project, and that volatility is the challenge.
The observation also travels well beyond Hollywood. Matrixed organizations generate dotted-line allegiances that collide under deadline pressure. Teams are told to move fast and innovate while guarding brand risk and maintaining compliance. Individuals are urged to be loyal, yet restructurings and pivots can reorder priorities overnight. Without explicit guidance, people default to local loyalties, and collaboration fragments.
The remedy implied is not to demand purer loyalty but to clarify the hierarchy of priorities and to make the reasons visible. Leaders owe teams a crisp articulation of what comes first this quarter, this launch, this crisis, and what values are nonnegotiable. Individuals, in turn, can practice transparent commitment: naming their obligations, disclosing conflicts, and raising misalignments early. In a world under one umbrella, loyalty becomes less about pledging to a silo and more about stewarding trust across the whole system.
Quote Details
| Topic | Business |
|---|
More Quotes by Scott
Add to List
