"The cartoons which I enjoy have caused some kind of out rage, but they have got people talking about these issues out in the open and in essence that's what its all about"

The quote by Jonathan Shapiro encapsulates the intriguing function of art, particularly cartoons, within social discourse. Shapiro, a renowned cartoonist, is understood for his sharp, typically satirical work that challenges viewers to believe seriously about dominating social and political problems. Here, he acknowledges that while his cartoons may provoke controversy and even outrage, they serve an important function in stimulating discussion and bringing important issues to the leading edge of public debate.

The preliminary recommendation of outrage recommends that the animations touch on sensitive subjects or present them in a manner that some might find uneasy or offending. This reaction is not unanticipated in the world of political and social satire, where pressing limits is a typical strategy utilized to highlight absurdities, hypocrisies, or injustices within society. Such responses, while challenging for creators, frequently show that the work has actually struck a chord, prompting audiences to challenge their beliefs or think about alternative point of views.

The expression "got people discussing these issues" highlights the cartoons' catalytic role in creating dialogue. In many ways, initiating discussion is an essential step towards awareness and change. By presenting subjects in a format that is both available and interesting, cartoons can reach diverse audiences, motivating individuals from different backgrounds and beliefs to engage with and go over the concerns at hand.

Shapiro concludes by stating that creating discussion is the ultimate goal, recommending that art's power depends on its ability to provoke idea and drive discourse. This shows a broader understanding of the function of art in society: not simply to entertain, but to inform, difficulty, and motivate change. In essence, the worth of such questionable art kinds lies less in the outrage they might at first provoke and more in the conversations and reflections they ultimately stimulate, leading the way for social development.