"The civilized are those who get more out of life than the uncivilized, and for this we are not likely to be forgiven"

Cyril Connolly's quote, "The civilized are those who get more out of life than the uncivilized, and for this we are not likely to be forgiven", provides a nuanced exploration of what it means to be "civilized" and the repercussions of this distinction. At its core, the quote juxtaposes 2 groups: the "civilized", who obtain greater complete satisfaction or take advantage of life, and the "uncivilized", who probably do not.

To unpack this, consider what Connolly may presume by "civilized". Generally, being civilized is associated with cultural advancement, education, improved good manners, and the capability to appreciate and participate in complicated societal structures. This idea indicates that the civilized can gain access to and make use of a wide range of resources, experiences, and opportunities-- cultural, technological, and intellectual-- that boost their quality of life. They can appreciate art, understand advanced innovations, and take part in advanced social institutions, all causing a potentially richer life experience.

On the other hand, those deemed "uncivilized" might be viewed as doing not have access to these aspects of modern-day society, whether due to geographical, academic, socio-economic, or cultural constraints. This lack arguably leads to less opportunities to "get more out of life", limiting experiences to more standard or survival-oriented concerns instead of the pursuit of intellectual or cultural enrichment.

The second part of Connolly's quote, "for this we are not most likely to be forgiven", suggests a moral or ethical dimension to this disparity. It raises questions about the fairness and ramifications of possessing such advantages. There's an underlying assumption that being "civilized" comes with a sense of regret or duty-- an understanding that these advantages are not universally distributed and might add to inequality. As a result, the "uncivilized" may harbor feelings of animosity or injustice towards the "civilized", viewing their elevated status as a tip of their own absence and the social structures that perpetuate this division.

In essence, Connolly's statement challenges readers to assess the benefits and effects of being "civilized". It welcomes self-questioning about how societal development affects human relationships and cultivates inequities, prompting a dialogue on how civilization can be more inclusive and generous in offering its benefits.