"The current diversity visa program does a disservice to our immigration policy and to those immigrants who have moved through the more traditional process that allows them to lawfully reside in this country"

In this quote, William L. Jenkins is expressing criticism of the Diversity Visa Lottery Game Program, which is a U.S. immigration initiative developed to increase the diversity of immigrant populations by offering a limited number of visas to people from countries with historically low rates of immigration to the United States. Jenkins recommends that this program weakens the overarching goals and fairness of U.S. migration policy.

By mentioning that the Diversity Visa program "does a disservice," Jenkins implies it detracts from the effectiveness or integrity of U.S. migration procedures. One possible interpretation is that he thinks the program presents components of possibility, instead of benefit, into the process of choosing immigrants. This can be viewed as contrasting with other migration paths that frequently require possible immigrants to satisfy specific criteria connected to abilities, education, familial ties, or humanitarian requirements, which are viewed as more organized and foreseeable.

Jenkins' referral to immigrants who have moved through "the more traditional procedure" highlights a perceived oppression or absence of equity. By utilizing the term "standard," he underscores a preference for established opportunities that frequently include extensive vetting, longer wait times, and clear requirements. There might be a ramification that those who browse these procedures deserve to be focused on or respected more than those who go into through the lottery game, who might not be subject to the same strict assessments.

Overall, Jenkins appears to be promoting for a migration policy that highlights control, predictability, and meritocracy, instead of randomness. The quote reflects a viewpoint worried about preserving a structured and potentially more limiting immigration system that values the conventional, extensive pathways over lottery-based entries. This position might resonate with audiences who value perceived fairness and orderliness in migration procedures but could be critiqued by those who see the Diversity Visa program as a vital methods of broadening cultural and market diversity within the U.S.