"The deadliest foe to virtue would be complete self-knowledge"
About this Quote
Bradley frames a paradox: the very enlightenment we crave could corrode the moral life. Self-knowledge is typically praised as the path to integrity, yet complete self-knowledge would strip away the consoling myths we tell ourselves about why we act well. Most virtuous conduct involves mixed motives — pride laced through generosity, fear of shame mixed with duty, the wish to be loved hiding beneath courage. If every ulterior strand were exposed beyond denial, the aura of purity around our actions would vanish. What often sustains moral effort is not perfect accuracy about ourselves but a hopeful, partially idealized picture that we try to live into.
He is also pushing back against moral self-consciousness as a permanent stance. Virtue, for him, thrives in habits, in doing what is right without theatrical scrutiny. The person standing on the threshold of every action dissecting motives may end up paralyzed, scrupulous rather than good. Bradley’s ethical vision in Ethical Studies places the self within social roles and shared practices — my station and its duties — rather than inside an isolating mirror of introspection. Too much analysis loosens the tie to community and action, converting moral life into self-surveillance.
The word complete matters. He is not condemning reflection, which can correct blindness and hypocrisy. He is warning that a fantasy of total transparency would be fatal. Human beings need a degree of tactful opacity: the capacity to forget, to forgive oneself, to accept that motives are never perfectly clean, and to act anyway. Moral aspiration depends on the gap between who we are and who we take ourselves to be; shrink that gap to zero too quickly and the momentum of striving disappears. Bradley’s provocation suggests that virtue is less a crystal of pure intention than a durable practice sustained by partial knowledge, self-forgetfulness, and the steady discipline of belonging to others.
He is also pushing back against moral self-consciousness as a permanent stance. Virtue, for him, thrives in habits, in doing what is right without theatrical scrutiny. The person standing on the threshold of every action dissecting motives may end up paralyzed, scrupulous rather than good. Bradley’s ethical vision in Ethical Studies places the self within social roles and shared practices — my station and its duties — rather than inside an isolating mirror of introspection. Too much analysis loosens the tie to community and action, converting moral life into self-surveillance.
The word complete matters. He is not condemning reflection, which can correct blindness and hypocrisy. He is warning that a fantasy of total transparency would be fatal. Human beings need a degree of tactful opacity: the capacity to forget, to forgive oneself, to accept that motives are never perfectly clean, and to act anyway. Moral aspiration depends on the gap between who we are and who we take ourselves to be; shrink that gap to zero too quickly and the momentum of striving disappears. Bradley’s provocation suggests that virtue is less a crystal of pure intention than a durable practice sustained by partial knowledge, self-forgetfulness, and the steady discipline of belonging to others.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|
More Quotes by H. Bradley
Add to List
