"The debts are unaffordable. If they won't cancel the debts I would suggest obstruction; you do it yourselves"
About this Quote
Sachs compresses an economic and moral argument into a blunt instruction. When debts cannot be paid without gutting clinics, schools, and basic infrastructure, insisting on payment becomes predatory, not prudent. Calling the debts unaffordable reframes the issue from will not pay to cannot pay. The second clause turns a policy preference into a strategy: if creditors refuse relief, debtors should assert agency through collective action rather than absorb endless austerity.
The context is the late 1990s and early 2000s debt crisis, when many low-income countries were trapped by obligations to the IMF, World Bank, and private lenders. Structural adjustment programs demanded budget cuts and privatizations that often deepened poverty. Sachs, once known for advising transitions in Eastern Europe, emerged as a prominent advocate of the Jubilee 2000 movement and of canceling the debts of heavily indebted poor countries. He argued that much of this debt was odious, contracted by unaccountable regimes, and already repaid many times over via interest and lost growth.
Obstruction can mean several things: payment moratoria, coordinated defaults, capital controls, or simply refusing new conditional loans that perpetuate the trap. It can also include public protest that disrupts the routine of creditor institutions, raising the political cost of inaction. The point is to flip the bargaining table. Debtors rarely have leverage; sanctions and market exclusion enforce compliance. By threatening disruption, they can force creditors to negotiate terms compatible with development and basic rights.
Critics warn of moral hazard, but Sachs counters that the greater hazard is maintaining a system that extracts from the poor to reassure the wealthy. Subsequent debt relief initiatives, notably in the mid-2000s, enabled measurable gains in health and education in countries like Uganda and Mozambique, partly vindicating his stance. The line still resonates amid today’s renewed debt distress, climate shocks, and pandemic legacies, insisting that dignity and development outrank the bookkeeping of unpayable claims.
The context is the late 1990s and early 2000s debt crisis, when many low-income countries were trapped by obligations to the IMF, World Bank, and private lenders. Structural adjustment programs demanded budget cuts and privatizations that often deepened poverty. Sachs, once known for advising transitions in Eastern Europe, emerged as a prominent advocate of the Jubilee 2000 movement and of canceling the debts of heavily indebted poor countries. He argued that much of this debt was odious, contracted by unaccountable regimes, and already repaid many times over via interest and lost growth.
Obstruction can mean several things: payment moratoria, coordinated defaults, capital controls, or simply refusing new conditional loans that perpetuate the trap. It can also include public protest that disrupts the routine of creditor institutions, raising the political cost of inaction. The point is to flip the bargaining table. Debtors rarely have leverage; sanctions and market exclusion enforce compliance. By threatening disruption, they can force creditors to negotiate terms compatible with development and basic rights.
Critics warn of moral hazard, but Sachs counters that the greater hazard is maintaining a system that extracts from the poor to reassure the wealthy. Subsequent debt relief initiatives, notably in the mid-2000s, enabled measurable gains in health and education in countries like Uganda and Mozambique, partly vindicating his stance. The line still resonates amid today’s renewed debt distress, climate shocks, and pandemic legacies, insisting that dignity and development outrank the bookkeeping of unpayable claims.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Jeffrey
Add to List
