"And that's the one thing that people do not understand is that we have very low interest rates and if those go back to historical levels or even go back to scary thoughts that they're back in the late '70s, early '80s, then that's going to really be hard to actually pay off those debts. It's going to be a - it's going to be a very big problem"
About this Quote
There is a practiced politician's sleight of hand in how Quayle frames the national debt as a sleeping monster that only wakes when interest rates rise. He is not arguing that debt is harmless; he's arguing that debt is conditionally harmless, dependent on a macroeconomic climate that can flip. The line works because it converts a wonky budget concern into a visceral time machine: late '70s, early '80s. Mentioning that era isn't nostalgia, it's a threat cue. For voters old enough to remember mortgage rates in the teens, it lands like a cold splash of water. For everyone else, "scary thoughts" supplies the emotion even if the data is hazy.
The subtext is a fight over responsibility. By focusing on rates rather than, say, healthcare costs or tax policy, he implies that today's debt is manageable only because we're being subsidized by unusually cheap money. That quietly indicts complacency: politicians can rack up obligations now because the bill looks small, but that's an illusion created by the Fed's post-crisis world. It's also a way to criticize spending without specifying what to cut, a useful vagueness in a coalition where every program has defenders.
Contextually, this is classic post-2008 fiscal anxiety politics: deficits reframed as an interest-rate trap. "Hard to actually pay off" is doing double duty, warning about government solvency while signaling household logic, as if the nation is a family with a variable-rate loan. The rhetoric isn't precision; it's leverage.
The subtext is a fight over responsibility. By focusing on rates rather than, say, healthcare costs or tax policy, he implies that today's debt is manageable only because we're being subsidized by unusually cheap money. That quietly indicts complacency: politicians can rack up obligations now because the bill looks small, but that's an illusion created by the Fed's post-crisis world. It's also a way to criticize spending without specifying what to cut, a useful vagueness in a coalition where every program has defenders.
Contextually, this is classic post-2008 fiscal anxiety politics: deficits reframed as an interest-rate trap. "Hard to actually pay off" is doing double duty, warning about government solvency while signaling household logic, as if the nation is a family with a variable-rate loan. The rhetoric isn't precision; it's leverage.
Quote Details
| Topic | Money |
|---|
More Quotes by Ben
Add to List
