"The decision of such judges as Claudius and his Senate is worth very little in the question of a man's innocence or guilt; but the sentence was that Seneca should be banished to the island of Corsica"

In this quote, Frederic William Farrar is critiquing the dependability and stability of the judgment gone by Emperor Claudius and his Senate relating to Seneca's fate. Farrar recommends that the judgment made by Claudius and his Senate brings little weight when evaluating the real innocence or guilt of a person. This implies that the judicial processes and decisions made under Claudius's rule were maybe arbitrary, affected by political biases, or lacking in fairness and neutrality.

Claudius, who was Roman Emperor from 41 to 54 AD, and his Senate are depicted as doing not have trustworthiness. This could be showing a more comprehensive historic view that sees specific political judgments of the Roman Empire as being heavily swayed by power characteristics and corruption, rather than by real justice. Farrar's choice to call their decision "worth really little" may suggest a belief that their procedures were flawed or that they were more worried with maintaining their power than giving true justice.

The line likewise informs us that the decision reached by Claudius and his Senate resulted in the banishment of Seneca to the island of Corsica. Seneca, a popular Roman theorist, statesman, and author, had actually been implicated of involvement in an alleged scandal. His exile to Corsica, a remote island, can also be viewed as a reflection of political machinations instead of purely legal thinking. Banishment was a common penalty in Roman times used frequently versus political rivals or those who fell out of favor, additional recommending that Seneca's punishment might have been more about political efficiency than legitimate guilt.

In general, Farrar's words motivate readers to concern and critically evaluate the justice systems of powerful entities, and to recognize the prospective harshness between decisions provided by those in power and the real fact. This assessment stays pertinent in any context where political power intersects with justice.