"The First Amendment to the Constitution reflects that concept recognized in the Ten Commandments, that the duties we owe to God and the manner of discharging those duties are outside the purview of government"
About this Quote
Roy Moore is doing two things at once here: wrapping a constitutional claim in biblical authority, and smuggling a Christian moral hierarchy into a doctrine that’s supposed to restrain the state from picking winners in matters of faith. The line is framed as modesty about government power, but it’s also a bid to redefine the First Amendment as an heir to the Ten Commandments rather than to Enlightenment liberalism, pluralism, or the Founders’ messy coalition of denominations and skeptics.
The rhetorical trick is “recognition.” Moore doesn’t argue that the Ten Commandments should govern; he suggests the Constitution merely “reflects” what Scripture already “recognized.” That’s a soft verb doing hard work: it implies continuity, inevitability, even fidelity. In that telling, religious liberty isn’t primarily a shield for diverse beliefs; it’s a Christian principle the state is obligated to honor because it precedes the state.
The subtext is that the Establishment Clause becomes secondary, maybe even suspect. By rooting First Amendment meaning in a specific religious text, Moore invites a narrowing of whose “duties” count as properly religious and whose practices look like errors the public square needn’t accommodate.
Context matters: Moore’s public career is tied to fights over Ten Commandments displays and a broader culture-war project that treats “separation of church and state” as a secular overreach. So the sentence reads less like constitutional interpretation and more like narrative control: if America’s founding freedom is actually a biblical inheritance, then public religious symbols aren’t establishment; they’re restoration.
The rhetorical trick is “recognition.” Moore doesn’t argue that the Ten Commandments should govern; he suggests the Constitution merely “reflects” what Scripture already “recognized.” That’s a soft verb doing hard work: it implies continuity, inevitability, even fidelity. In that telling, religious liberty isn’t primarily a shield for diverse beliefs; it’s a Christian principle the state is obligated to honor because it precedes the state.
The subtext is that the Establishment Clause becomes secondary, maybe even suspect. By rooting First Amendment meaning in a specific religious text, Moore invites a narrowing of whose “duties” count as properly religious and whose practices look like errors the public square needn’t accommodate.
Context matters: Moore’s public career is tied to fights over Ten Commandments displays and a broader culture-war project that treats “separation of church and state” as a secular overreach. So the sentence reads less like constitutional interpretation and more like narrative control: if America’s founding freedom is actually a biblical inheritance, then public religious symbols aren’t establishment; they’re restoration.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Roy
Add to List
