"The intelligence failures with respect to Iraq were massive and have damaged our credibility around the world"
About this Quote
“Massive” is doing legal, political, and moral work here. Carl Levin isn’t just describing a botched briefing cycle; he’s sizing the failure so it can’t be brushed off as the fog of war or a few bad calls. As a Senate heavyweight on defense and oversight, Levin speaks in the careful cadence of institutional critique: blunt enough to land, disciplined enough to survive hearings, headlines, and history.
The line’s intent is twofold. First, it assigns the Iraq debacle to “intelligence failures,” a phrase that both indicts and contains. It points upward at a system that produced certainty where it should’ve produced doubt, while sidestepping the more incendiary charge that officials willfully shaped intelligence to fit a predetermined war. That ambiguity is strategic. In Washington, alleging manipulation invites a knife fight; alleging failure invites reform, resignations, and a paper trail.
The subtext is about trust as a form of power. “Damaged our credibility around the world” frames the consequence not primarily as Iraqi suffering or American casualties, but as erosion of the currency the US uses to lead: allies’ confidence, adversaries’ deterrence calculations, even the plausibility of future claims about threats. Levin is speaking to the post-2003 hangover, when WMD assertions collapsed and every subsequent warning, from Iran to Syria, carried an asterisk.
Contextually, it’s a veteran legislator warning that empire runs on narrative discipline. When the story breaks, the strategy breaks with it.
The line’s intent is twofold. First, it assigns the Iraq debacle to “intelligence failures,” a phrase that both indicts and contains. It points upward at a system that produced certainty where it should’ve produced doubt, while sidestepping the more incendiary charge that officials willfully shaped intelligence to fit a predetermined war. That ambiguity is strategic. In Washington, alleging manipulation invites a knife fight; alleging failure invites reform, resignations, and a paper trail.
The subtext is about trust as a form of power. “Damaged our credibility around the world” frames the consequence not primarily as Iraqi suffering or American casualties, but as erosion of the currency the US uses to lead: allies’ confidence, adversaries’ deterrence calculations, even the plausibility of future claims about threats. Levin is speaking to the post-2003 hangover, when WMD assertions collapsed and every subsequent warning, from Iran to Syria, carried an asterisk.
Contextually, it’s a veteran legislator warning that empire runs on narrative discipline. When the story breaks, the strategy breaks with it.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Carl
Add to List




