"The intelligence investigation under the leadership of Senator Church, which I know has helped cause this investigation by you, points out that the agencies did not disclose certain facts to us and that certain plots were going on"
About this Quote
Cooper’s sentence is a careful piece of congressional knife-work: it indicts the intelligence agencies while sounding almost politely procedural. The phrase “which I know has helped cause this investigation by you” is doing quiet but heavy lifting. He’s flattering the listener’s legitimacy (you are investigating because responsible people like Church made it necessary) while building a chain of causation that makes the inquiry feel inevitable, not partisan. That’s key in the mid-1970s moment, when the Church Committee’s revelations about CIA and FBI abuses had made “oversight” a newly urgent word in Washington.
The real charge lands in the blandest language possible: “did not disclose certain facts” and “certain plots were going on.” Cooper doesn’t say “lied,” doesn’t say “illegal operations,” doesn’t name targets or countries. The vagueness is strategic. It signals the presence of classified landmines while still telling the public what matters: elected officials were kept in the dark, and covert action wasn’t just hypothetical policy but active, ongoing scheming. “Plots” is a loaded term in American political English; it implies both conspiracy and intent, the sense that agencies were authors of events rather than neutral gatherers of information.
Subtextually, Cooper is drawing a boundary around constitutional authority. By framing nondisclosure as the central offense, he’s not only condemning specific operations but also the bureaucratic habit of treating Congress as an audience to be managed. It’s accountability language shaped for an era when the myth of omniscient, benevolent intelligence had cracked, and lawmakers needed a way to say: the problem isn’t secrecy in principle; it’s secrecy aimed upward.
The real charge lands in the blandest language possible: “did not disclose certain facts” and “certain plots were going on.” Cooper doesn’t say “lied,” doesn’t say “illegal operations,” doesn’t name targets or countries. The vagueness is strategic. It signals the presence of classified landmines while still telling the public what matters: elected officials were kept in the dark, and covert action wasn’t just hypothetical policy but active, ongoing scheming. “Plots” is a loaded term in American political English; it implies both conspiracy and intent, the sense that agencies were authors of events rather than neutral gatherers of information.
Subtextually, Cooper is drawing a boundary around constitutional authority. By framing nondisclosure as the central offense, he’s not only condemning specific operations but also the bureaucratic habit of treating Congress as an audience to be managed. It’s accountability language shaped for an era when the myth of omniscient, benevolent intelligence had cracked, and lawmakers needed a way to say: the problem isn’t secrecy in principle; it’s secrecy aimed upward.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by John
Add to List
