"The legal right of a taxpayer to decrease the amount of what otherwise would be his taxes, or altogether avoid them, by means which the law permits, cannot be doubted"
About this Quote
The intent is narrowly legalistic: to separate evasion (illegal) from avoidance (legal). Yet the subtext is broader and distinctly class-coded. By framing the taxpayer’s goal as “decrease” or “altogether avoid” taxes, Sutherland normalizes the most aggressive form of minimization as a rational exercise of rights. Taxes become a default extraction “otherwise” owed, not a democratically chosen contribution. The citizen is recast as a rights-bearing optimizer; the state is the adversary whose reach must be cabined by technical compliance.
Context matters. Sutherland served in an era when corporate power, wealth concentration, and skepticism of regulation were hotly litigated, and the Court often treated economic liberty as a constitutional value. This sentence fits that worldview: legality is the bright line, and the sophistication to exploit “means which the law permits” is implicitly respectable. It also hints at a quiet institutional shrug: if loopholes exist, that’s Congress’s problem.
The quote endures because it captures the American compromise in one crisp rule: morality is optional, but paperwork is sacred.
Quote Details
| Topic | Money |
|---|---|
| Source | Verified source: Gregory v. Helvering (U.S. Supreme Court opinion) (George Sutherland, 1935)
Evidence: The legal right of a taxpayer to decrease the amount of what otherwise would be his taxes, or altogether avoid them, by means which the law permits, cannot be doubted. (Page 469 (293 U.S. 465, 469)). This sentence appears in Justice George Sutherland’s opinion for a unanimous Court in Gregory v. Helvering, decided January 7, 1935. It is commonly quoted as the canonical statement that lawful tax avoidance is permitted. In the same paragraph, the opinion cites earlier authorities (including United States v. Isham, 84 U.S. (17 Wall.) 496, and Superior Oil Co. v. Mississippi, 280 U.S. 390) as support; however, the wording you provided is verbatim from Gregory (293 U.S. at 469), so the earliest identifiable publication of this exact formulation is the U.S. Supreme Court’s published opinion in United States Reports. Other candidates (1) Role of U.S. Correspondent Banking in International Money... (United States. Congress. Senate. Comm..., 2001) compilation98.7% ... The legal right of a taxpayer to decrease the amount of what otherwise would be his taxes . or altogether avoid t... |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Sutherland, George. (2026, February 15). The legal right of a taxpayer to decrease the amount of what otherwise would be his taxes, or altogether avoid them, by means which the law permits, cannot be doubted. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/the-legal-right-of-a-taxpayer-to-decrease-the-60814/
Chicago Style
Sutherland, George. "The legal right of a taxpayer to decrease the amount of what otherwise would be his taxes, or altogether avoid them, by means which the law permits, cannot be doubted." FixQuotes. February 15, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/the-legal-right-of-a-taxpayer-to-decrease-the-60814/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"The legal right of a taxpayer to decrease the amount of what otherwise would be his taxes, or altogether avoid them, by means which the law permits, cannot be doubted." FixQuotes, 15 Feb. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/the-legal-right-of-a-taxpayer-to-decrease-the-60814/. Accessed 18 Feb. 2026.







