"The Middle East is more angry than ever. I'm afraid that the sort of deceit on the route to war was linked to the lack of preparation for afterwards and the chaos and suffering that continuous - so it won't go away will it?"

Clare Short's quote shows a crucial viewpoint on the geopolitical circumstance in the Middle East, highlighting a number of interconnected concerns. At the core, she points to a heightened state of anger and discontent in the region, indicating that these sentiments have escalated gradually.

Short suggests that deceit played a crucial role in the lead-up to conflict, possibly referring to the false information or lack of transparency that typically accompanies military engagements. This deceit may include misrepresenting motives for war, exaggerating dangers, or stopping working to disclose the full ramifications of military actions. Such deceit not just undermines trust however also makes complex peace-building efforts, as the real intents and actions are obscured.

She further links this deceit to an absence of sufficient preparation for the consequences of war. The failure to plan for post-war reconstruction and governance typically results in chaos, as political and social facilities are left in chaos. This overlook contributes to prolonged instability and humanitarian crises, causing suffering for the regional population who should browse a landscape marked by damage and disorder.

By mentioning, "so it won't disappear will it?" Short suggests that the anger and suffering in the Middle East are consistent problems, rooted in systemic failures and neglect. The continuous nature of these issues recommends that unless there is a basic shift in method-- both in terms of openness pre-war and thorough planning post-conflict-- they are not likely to fix.

This reflection serves as a review of previous and continuous global interventions, advising policymakers to recognize the long-lasting impact of their actions and to pursue responsibility and foresight in their techniques. Eventually, Short's words require a reassessment of how worldwide powers engage with the Middle East, advocating for solutions that deal with underlying causes rather than symptomatic symptoms of conflict.