"The more expansive government is, the more perils people face in daily lives, be it from IRS agents or from child support services, or from other agencies that often have little or no legal restraints on their power"

James Bovard's quote critiques the extensive nature of government and its prospective impact on specific freedoms and daily life. He suggests that as government grows bigger, it ends up being more intrusive, increasing the probability of people dealing with obstacles from numerous federal government agencies.

Firstly, the expression "the more extensive federal government is" mean a government that has actually increased its reach and participation in many aspects of life. This growth frequently features a boost in regulations, laws, and oversight, impacting everything from economics to individual conduct.

Bovard highlights "perils individuals deal with in every day lives," showing that this expansion isn't benign however rather filled with risks for ordinary citizens. These dangers aren't just theoretical but appear in real-world interactions with federal government entities. By discussing the IRS and child assistance services, Bovard brings attention to specific firms known for their regulative and enforcement powers. The IRS, for example, is typically viewed as a formidable agency due to its authority to audit and penalize for tax disparities. Also, kid support services can enforce considerable legal and monetary effects on people.

Moreover, when Bovard states that these firms "often have little or no legal restraints on their power," he is critiquing the perceived lack of oversight and accountability. This concept suggests that such firms can in some cases run with a level of autonomy that might not always be checked by legal defenses or requirements, possibly leading to abuses of power or overlook of due process.

In general, Bovard's quote raises concerns about the balance in between government intervention and personal liberty. It suggests that an ever-expanding government carries the risk of overreach, where citizens must browse a significantly intricate web of policies and oversight, potentially infringing on their flexibilities and quality of life. The core of Bovard's argument is a care against untreated governmental power and the advocacy for caution in protecting private rights versus administrative overextension.