"The most interesting thing about change in the environment is that for the most part the environment isn't changing"
About this Quote
Kevin Kelly’s line lands like a quiet needle scratch in our culture’s ambient soundtrack of disruption. We live under a permanent weather report of “unprecedented change,” and Kelly flips the premise: the truly interesting feature of environmental change is its stubborn continuity. The wit is in the reversal. It’s not denialism; it’s a critique of our attention economy, which treats novelty as the only signal worth amplifying.
As an editor and systems thinker, Kelly is allergic to single-frame thinking. “For the most part” does a lot of work: it concedes real shifts while insisting that stability is the bigger, underappreciated story. Most landscapes, institutions, and ecological rhythms don’t lurch every news cycle; they drift, accumulate, and then suddenly appear to have “changed,” largely because our measurement and memory are short. The subtext is that our tools for perceiving change are biased toward drama. We notice the wildfire, not the decades of fire suppression; the freak storm, not the slow warming that loads the dice.
Contextually, this fits Kelly’s long-running argument that technology and culture evolve in gradients and feedback loops, not just in headline-grabbing leaps. It’s also a warning about complacency: stability can be an illusion produced by timescales. The environment “isn’t changing” in the way our brains prefer to track it - fast, discrete, narratable - which is exactly why we miss the kind of change that matters until it’s irreversible.
As an editor and systems thinker, Kelly is allergic to single-frame thinking. “For the most part” does a lot of work: it concedes real shifts while insisting that stability is the bigger, underappreciated story. Most landscapes, institutions, and ecological rhythms don’t lurch every news cycle; they drift, accumulate, and then suddenly appear to have “changed,” largely because our measurement and memory are short. The subtext is that our tools for perceiving change are biased toward drama. We notice the wildfire, not the decades of fire suppression; the freak storm, not the slow warming that loads the dice.
Contextually, this fits Kelly’s long-running argument that technology and culture evolve in gradients and feedback loops, not just in headline-grabbing leaps. It’s also a warning about complacency: stability can be an illusion produced by timescales. The environment “isn’t changing” in the way our brains prefer to track it - fast, discrete, narratable - which is exactly why we miss the kind of change that matters until it’s irreversible.
Quote Details
| Topic | Change |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Kevin
Add to List
