"The perception is that baseball's players' union is protecting players to use steroids and other illegal performance-enhancing drugs"
About this Quote
Bunning’s line is less an observation than a pressure tactic, built to make the union defend itself on hostile ground. “The perception is” lets him float an accusation while keeping his own hands clean: he’s not claiming the union is doing it, he’s claiming the public thinks it is. That rhetorical dodge is the point. It’s a politician’s way of laundering blame through an imaginary focus group, then demanding action as if the verdict has already been reached.
The subtext is an inversion of what unions are supposed to do. A players’ association exists to protect members from capricious management, preserve due process, and bargain over working conditions. Bunning reframes that protective function as moral complicity: if the union insists on privacy, fair testing procedures, or limits on punishment, it can be painted as “protecting” cheaters. The sentence turns collective bargaining into a cover-up, collapsing the difference between defending rights and defending wrongdoing.
The context is the steroid-era panic that hit baseball as a cultural scandal and a political opportunity. Congress wanted a villain, and “baseball” is too abstract; “the union” is a concrete institution with negotiators, lawyers, and rules that can be dragged into hearings. Bunning’s phrasing tees up a familiar American storyline: labor as obstruction, regulation as virtue, and individual misconduct as proof that an entire system is corrupt. It works because it exploits a public hunger for purification while sidestepping the messier truth that the sport’s incentives - from owners to fans - helped build the era he’s condemning.
The subtext is an inversion of what unions are supposed to do. A players’ association exists to protect members from capricious management, preserve due process, and bargain over working conditions. Bunning reframes that protective function as moral complicity: if the union insists on privacy, fair testing procedures, or limits on punishment, it can be painted as “protecting” cheaters. The sentence turns collective bargaining into a cover-up, collapsing the difference between defending rights and defending wrongdoing.
The context is the steroid-era panic that hit baseball as a cultural scandal and a political opportunity. Congress wanted a villain, and “baseball” is too abstract; “the union” is a concrete institution with negotiators, lawyers, and rules that can be dragged into hearings. Bunning’s phrasing tees up a familiar American storyline: labor as obstruction, regulation as virtue, and individual misconduct as proof that an entire system is corrupt. It works because it exploits a public hunger for purification while sidestepping the messier truth that the sport’s incentives - from owners to fans - helped build the era he’s condemning.
Quote Details
| Topic | Sports |
|---|
More Quotes by Jim
Add to List




