"The purpose of the UN mechanism, this inspection mechanism, is not to engage in a cat and mouse game with Saddam Hussein and try to find weapons that the Iraqi government is working on concealing"

In this quote, Douglas Feith attends to the more comprehensive objective of the United Nations' examination mechanism relating to Iraq under Saddam Hussein's routine. The quote suggests a critique or explanation of what the UN's role is-- or should be-- when it comes to the weapons inspection process. Here's an interpretation of its crucial elements:

1. ** Purpose of the UN Mechanism **: Feith stresses the designated function of the UN evaluation body. The phrase suggests that the purpose is not simply tactical or functional however tactical and principled. The UN's role, as implied, is to make sure compliance with worldwide peace and security standards, rooted in cooperative verification instead of adversarial gamesmanship.

2. ** Inspection Mechanism **: This term connects to the procedures and operations of bodies such as the United Nations Special Commission (UNSCOM) and later on the United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission (UNMOVIC), which were charged with examining Iraq for weapons of mass damage (WMDs). Their mission was to verify Saddam Hussein's federal government's disarmament, particularly concerning chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons capabilities.

3. ** Cat and Mouse Game **: This metaphor highlights a scenario of persistent evasion and pursuit. By invoking it, Feith recommends that the vibrant in between Iraqi authorities and UN inspectors ought to not degenerate into a consistent cycle of concealment efforts by Iraq and following pursuit by inspectors. A "cat and mouse" scenario indicates futility and limitless battle, which Feith argues is not an optimum or preferred outcome for such an important worldwide venture.

4. ** Iraqi Government Concealment **: The quote implicitly slams Saddam Hussein's routine for its history of non-cooperation and deceit regarding WMDs. For Feith, the focus ought to be on reliable disarmament through transparent and cooperative ways rather than being ensnared in tactical maneuvers with a non-compliant regime.

In conclusion, Feith alerts against the assessments being controlled into a useless, cyclical pursuit and rather promotes for a structure that promotes real transparency and compliance, which are crucial for keeping worldwide peace and security.