"The question is no longer whether the United States should contribute to assuring Israel's survival and prosperity; that goes without saying"

George Ball's quote, "The question is no longer whether the United States must add to assuring Israel's survival and prosperity; that goes without saying", encapsulates a conclusive position relating to the U.S.-Israel relationship. This statement recommends a shift in discourse from debating the merits of U.S. support for Israel to talking about how finest to implement that support, indicating that America's function as a benefactor is presumed and entrenched.

Ball, an extremely influential diplomat and thinker, recognized the tactical and moral imperatives binding the 2 nations. The phrase "that goes without saying" implies that the need of U.S. support for Israel was a given, showing a political and cultural consensus at the time. This could be attributed to several factors, including shared democratic values, cultural ties, and shared geopolitical interests in an area marked by volatility.

The historic context of Ball's statement is crucial. Post-World War II, and specifically after the Six-Day War in 1967, Israel became a pivotal ally for the United States in the Middle East, an area of substantial strategic value due to its oil reserves and geopolitical dynamics. The Cold War background even more strengthened this alliance, with the U.S. looking for to maintain influence and counter Soviet ties with surrounding Arab countries.

Ball's assertion acknowledges the deep-rooted alliance while moving the discussion forward to focus on the subtleties of assistance-- whether in regards to military help, diplomatic backing, or financial partnership. It underlines the significance of a robust assistance structure ensuring Israel's security, acknowledging danger perceptions faced by Israel from surrounding countries and non-state stars.

The statement likewise reflects ethical dimensions, emphasizing the U.S. commitment to supporting a nation that shares its democratic values, for that reason mixing realpolitik with ethical commitments. Ball's words continue to resonate in contemporary conversations about diplomacy, highlighting withstanding concerns about the nature and scope of bilateral relationships amidst developing international difficulties.