"The relationships that people have - that are sexual, psychological, emotional - these relationships are not open to supervision by parents, schools, churches, or government. Nobody has any right to intervene at all in any kind of relationship like that"

Madalyn Murray O'Hair, a widely known advocate for atheism and private rights, utilizes this quote to highlight the sanctity and autonomy of personal relationships. Her declaration highlights the idea that relationships-- whether they are sexual, psychological, or psychological-- are a private element of human life that must be devoid of external control or interference.

In her view, such relationships are a fundamental kind of human expression and connection that should be appreciated as individual and inviolable. By specifying that they are "not open to guidance", O'Hair asserts that these interactions are naturally private and need to not undergo external scrutiny or regulation by reliable institutions like parents, instructional systems, spiritual organizations, or federal government bodies.

Her viewpoint lines up with a broader libertarian view of personal liberties and individual rights, where the borders of individual space are secured from institutional overreach. O'Hair's rhetoric can be interpreted as a call to maintain the freedom of people to form and maintain bonds based on their individual options and permission, without social or institutional pressures forming or determining those connections.

Furthermore, her inclusion of various influential social organizations highlights the pervasive nature of these entities in attempting to manage or affect personal life choices. By explicitly mentioning that "no one has any right to intervene", O'Hair is advocating for the concept that individual relationships are a domain of pure personal sovereignty.

This philosophy motivates a respect for human self-respect and autonomy, underpinning the significance of personal choice devoid of institutional oversight. It's a strong assertion of the belief that individuals ought to have the ultimate authority over their personal lives and decisions, a theme that resonates with wider disputes about privacy, autonomy, and human rights in society.