"The right really dominates radio, and it's amazing how much energy the right spends telling us that the press is slanted to the left when it really isn't. They want to shut other people up. They really don't understand the First Amendment"

Roger Ebert's quote addresses the perceived media predisposition and the dynamics of complimentary speech in the context of American political discourse. His declaration critiques the political right's story surrounding media bias and their purported misconception of the First Modification.

Ebert starts by acknowledging the right's significant presence in radio. Historically, conservative voices have actually dominated talk radio, with figures like Rush Limbaugh forming a considerable portion of the discourse. This supremacy is contrasted with Ebert's observation of the right's consistent narrative that the wider press leans towards the left. Through this lens, Ebert recommends that the right's claims about journalism being liberally slanted may not hold as much weight as asserted. His observation proposes that in spite of the accusations, the media landscape is more balanced and even tilted towards the right in particular platforms, especially radio.

Ebert follows with a review of the right's supposed efforts to silence varying opinions. He recommends that their narrative about a left-leaning press and subsequent calls for less diversity of opinions, point towards a desire to suppress opposing views rather than take part in positive discussion. This is a crucial dynamic to consider, as it shines a light on methods used in political rhetoric to sway public opinion by delegitimizing specific stories or platforms.

In addition, Ebert's mention of the First Amendment highlights his belief in the value of free speech and a diverse media landscape. The First Amendment ensures liberty of the press and speech, promoting for a multiplicity of voices in public discourse. Ebert explains that efforts to control media or reject voices as biased undermines the really concept of totally free speech, which not just permits however motivates a range of viewpoints. Essentially, Ebert argues for a more open exchange of concepts that honors the constitutional right of complimentary speech, rather than narrowing the field to a single ideology.