"The script was very explicit about the nudity that was supposed to be in the movie. Actually, they don't show everything we shot. They would cut here and it was floored. It was very embarrassing"
About this Quote
Diane Kruger's quote supplies insight into her experience working on a film that involved nudity. Her comments expose a tension in between the script's needs, the directorial intent, and the final edit shown to the audience. Initially, she notes that the script was "very specific about the nudity", suggesting that the filmmakers were transparent from the beginning about the levels of direct exposure gotten out of the actors. This transparency might normally serve as a professional courtesy, preparing stars for what the role entails so they can consent with full awareness.
However, Kruger discusses, "Actually, they don't show everything we shot", which shows an inconsistency in between what was filmed and what was ultimately included in the movie. This could be due to several factors: creative decisions in the editing procedure, audience perceptiveness, or censorship requirements. It's possible the filmmakers, upon evaluating the footage, decided that certain scenes weren't required for the narrative or were too intriguing, deciding rather to cut to keep the film's desired tone or rating.
The expression, "They would cut here and it was floored", recommends that some footage was left on the cutting room flooring, either since it interfered with the scene's psychological impact or since it pushed limits too far. Kruger's usage of "floored" highlights her surprise or frustration at these editorial options, perhaps meaning a difference in vision in between her and the filmmakers.
Lastly, Kruger explains the experience as "very embarrassing". This admission might come from vulnerability associated with carrying out in the naked or her pain with the possible public understanding of the scenes as shot versus those in fact revealed. It highlights a star's individual struggle between expert commitment and individual comfort, pointing to the nuanced conversations around artistic expression, authorization, and privacy in the film industry.
More details
About the Author