"The strongest arguments prove nothing so long as the conclusions are not verified by experience. Experimental science is the queen of sciences and the goal of all speculation"
About this Quote
Arguments can dazzle, but they do not compel nature. Roger Bacon draws a sharp line between the elegance of reasoning and the stubbornness of the world, insisting that conclusions gain authority only when experience confirms them. He elevates experimental inquiry to the rank of queen because it tests, corrects, and completes what speculation proposes. Reason can suggest possibilities; only experiment can make them necessary.
The context is the 13th century, when scholastic thinkers prized syllogism, commentary, and citation of authorities, especially Aristotle. Bacon, a Franciscan friar and Oxford scholar, learned that such methods often generated learned error. In the Opus Majus, written for Pope Clement IV, he argues for scientia experimentalis as the arbiter of certainty and as the engine of useful works. He rails against the four great causes of ignorance: undue reverence for authority, uncritical custom, deference to the crowd, and the conceit of seeming wise. Against these, he proposes disciplined observation, measurement, and trial.
His commitment was not merely theoretical. Drawing on Arabic science, especially Ibn al-Haytham’s optics, he studied light, vision, and the rainbow, showing how controlled observation and geometry yield reliable knowledge. He discussed lenses that aid sight and hinted at gunpowder’s composition, tying knowledge to palpable effects. For Bacon, experiment reveals causes and produces works, from better calendars and navigation to technologies that improve life; it also guards theology by purging errors born of unfounded speculation.
Yet he remains medieval in aim: experiment serves higher ends and corrects reason rather than replacing it. The lasting power of his claim lies in its methodical humility. Speculation is a beginning, not a verdict. Hypotheses must face trials, results must be replicable, and conclusions must be proportioned to what experience permits. By enthroning experiment as queen, Bacon sketches the discipline later called the scientific method: a governance of thought by the verdict of things.
The context is the 13th century, when scholastic thinkers prized syllogism, commentary, and citation of authorities, especially Aristotle. Bacon, a Franciscan friar and Oxford scholar, learned that such methods often generated learned error. In the Opus Majus, written for Pope Clement IV, he argues for scientia experimentalis as the arbiter of certainty and as the engine of useful works. He rails against the four great causes of ignorance: undue reverence for authority, uncritical custom, deference to the crowd, and the conceit of seeming wise. Against these, he proposes disciplined observation, measurement, and trial.
His commitment was not merely theoretical. Drawing on Arabic science, especially Ibn al-Haytham’s optics, he studied light, vision, and the rainbow, showing how controlled observation and geometry yield reliable knowledge. He discussed lenses that aid sight and hinted at gunpowder’s composition, tying knowledge to palpable effects. For Bacon, experiment reveals causes and produces works, from better calendars and navigation to technologies that improve life; it also guards theology by purging errors born of unfounded speculation.
Yet he remains medieval in aim: experiment serves higher ends and corrects reason rather than replacing it. The lasting power of his claim lies in its methodical humility. Speculation is a beginning, not a verdict. Hypotheses must face trials, results must be replicable, and conclusions must be proportioned to what experience permits. By enthroning experiment as queen, Bacon sketches the discipline later called the scientific method: a governance of thought by the verdict of things.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|
More Quotes by Roger
Add to List
