"We have to learn again that science without contact with experiments is an enterprise which is likely to go completely astray into imaginary conjecture"
About this Quote
Alfven is throwing a scientist-to-scientist warning shot: theory is seductive, but it’s also a hall of mirrors when it stops answering to the lab. The phrase “learn again” does a lot of work. It implies a collective amnesia - not ignorance, but drift. A field can become so fluent in its own mathematics, so rewarded for elegance and internal consistency, that it forgets the rude discipline of reality checks. He’s not anti-theory; he’s anti-theory that no longer risks humiliation.
“Contact with experiments” reads almost physical, like a grounding wire. Without it, science becomes “an enterprise” - bureaucratic, self-perpetuating - rather than an inquiry. And “completely astray” isn’t gentle. Alfven is describing not minor error bars but whole cosmologies built on “imaginary conjecture,” a phrase that stings because conjecture is supposed to be provisional. Add “imaginary” and it becomes self-referential: ideas generating more ideas, untethered from measurement, peer prestige substituting for proof.
The context matters: Alfven was a Nobel-winning plasma physicist who clashed with prevailing astrophysical models and was famously impatient with armchair cosmology. Mid-century space science was exploding with new data, yet also with grand theories that outpaced instrumentation. His line anticipates a modern pattern: disciplines (from cosmology to parts of AI and economics) building intricate edifices where the incentives favor publishable cleverness over empirical friction.
The intent isn’t nostalgia for test tubes; it’s a demand for epistemic accountability. Experiment isn’t decoration. It’s the thing that makes science science.
“Contact with experiments” reads almost physical, like a grounding wire. Without it, science becomes “an enterprise” - bureaucratic, self-perpetuating - rather than an inquiry. And “completely astray” isn’t gentle. Alfven is describing not minor error bars but whole cosmologies built on “imaginary conjecture,” a phrase that stings because conjecture is supposed to be provisional. Add “imaginary” and it becomes self-referential: ideas generating more ideas, untethered from measurement, peer prestige substituting for proof.
The context matters: Alfven was a Nobel-winning plasma physicist who clashed with prevailing astrophysical models and was famously impatient with armchair cosmology. Mid-century space science was exploding with new data, yet also with grand theories that outpaced instrumentation. His line anticipates a modern pattern: disciplines (from cosmology to parts of AI and economics) building intricate edifices where the incentives favor publishable cleverness over empirical friction.
The intent isn’t nostalgia for test tubes; it’s a demand for epistemic accountability. Experiment isn’t decoration. It’s the thing that makes science science.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|---|
| Source | Hannes Alfvén — quote as given appears on the Wikiquote page for Hannes Alfvén (entry reproduces: "We must learn again that science without contact with experiment is an enterprise which is likely to go completely astray into imaginary conjecture."). |
More Quotes by Hannes
Add to List






