"The typical journalist's typical lead for the typical Canadian story nowadays is along this line: that Canadians are hard at work trying to gain a reputation as a nation of rapid social change"
About this Quote
Day’s line is a matryoshka doll of “typical”: typical journalist, typical lead, typical story. The repetition is doing the political work. It flattens the press into a single, predictable voice and reduces a country’s complexity into a media trope. Before he even argues, he implies the argument has already been pre-chewed by a chattering class that can’t stop writing the same Canada story: earnest, self-conscious, forever “becoming.”
The phrasing “hard at work trying to gain a reputation” is the tell. It frames social change not as a response to real pressures (demographics, rights movements, economic shifts) but as branding: Canadians as publicity interns for their own modernity. The subtext is suspicion of performative progressivism and the institutions that validate it, especially national media and the urban culture it’s presumed to serve. Day doesn’t need to name what kind of “change” he’s skeptical of; the insinuation invites his audience to fill in the blanks with whatever reforms they already resent.
Context matters: Day rose in an era when Canadian conservatism was trying to consolidate itself against a Liberal-friendly national narrative, with Ottawa, the CBC, and big-city newsrooms often cast as gatekeepers of respectability. So the barb lands in two directions at once. It mocks journalists for cliché-making, and it nudges Canadians to see “rapid social change” as a storyline imposed on them, not a choice they made. The real target isn’t a sentence lead; it’s the authority to define what Canada is for.
The phrasing “hard at work trying to gain a reputation” is the tell. It frames social change not as a response to real pressures (demographics, rights movements, economic shifts) but as branding: Canadians as publicity interns for their own modernity. The subtext is suspicion of performative progressivism and the institutions that validate it, especially national media and the urban culture it’s presumed to serve. Day doesn’t need to name what kind of “change” he’s skeptical of; the insinuation invites his audience to fill in the blanks with whatever reforms they already resent.
Context matters: Day rose in an era when Canadian conservatism was trying to consolidate itself against a Liberal-friendly national narrative, with Ottawa, the CBC, and big-city newsrooms often cast as gatekeepers of respectability. So the barb lands in two directions at once. It mocks journalists for cliché-making, and it nudges Canadians to see “rapid social change” as a storyline imposed on them, not a choice they made. The real target isn’t a sentence lead; it’s the authority to define what Canada is for.
Quote Details
| Topic | Change |
|---|
More Quotes by Stockwell
Add to List
