"The United Nations has become a place where many countries seek to achieve a lynching of the United States by resolution"

In this quote, Vernon A. Walters, an American diplomat and former United Nations Ambassador, expresses a crucial view of the United Nations and its dynamic concerning the United States. The choice of the word "lynching" is particularly strong and expressive, recommending not just criticism however a managed and hostile action against the United States. Here, Walters indicates that within the UN, there exists a tendency amongst lots of nations to join against the US, using resolutions as a method to target or single it out.

The phrase "lynching by resolution" conveys a sense of unfairness or oppression, as lynching historically describes an extrajudicial killing, often racially inspired, representing mob justice. By using this metaphor, Walters most likely means to highlight what he views as undue, maybe illogical, attacks or condemnation aimed at the US within the worldwide arena. This framing suggests a perception that these criticisms may be extreme, unjustified, or inspired by aspects beyond genuine concern over specific US actions or policies.

Furthermore, Walters' declaration suggests an understanding of the UN as a phase where geopolitical characteristics play out in manner ins which are adversarial to American interests. In his view, the process of passing resolutions could be seen as a tool for countries to reveal opposition towards United States policies collectively or to challenge its international influence.

This quote shows broader themes in international relations, such as the balance of power, the role of multilateral organizations, and the typically controversial relationships between powerful countries and the rest of the global neighborhood. It highlights the complexities and the often contentious nature of diplomacy where national interests, historic complaints, and international politics converge in a global forum such as the United Nations. It serves as a sharp suggestion of the challenges fundamental in international diplomacy, where diverse and often conflicting point of views assemble.