"The very purpose of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution is to protect minority rights against majority voters. Every court decision that strikes down discriminatory legislation, including past Supreme Court decisions, affirming the fundamental rights to marry the person you love, overrules a majority decision"

David Boies, a prominent American legal representative, articulates a fundamental element of constitutional democracy in his quote, emphasizing the function of the Costs of Rights and the Constitution in securing minority rights versus the potential tyranny of the majority. This articulates an essential principle of American jurisprudence-- the protection of individual and minority rights from the impulses of majoritarian rule.

In a democracy, the bulk's decisions drive governance through elections and legislation. Nevertheless, Boies mentions that this democratic procedure can often result in the oppression of minority groups if their rights undergo the bias or misunderstandings of the majority. The Bill of Rights and the Constitution act as foundational structures ensuring that individual liberties and minority rights are not bypassed by bulk rule. This concept is essential in maintaining a just society where all people, no matter their minority status, are treated as equates to under the law.

Boies specifically highlights court choices that invalidate discriminatory laws. These decisions translate the Constitution as a living file that progresses to safeguard fundamental rights, such as marital relationship equality, despite prevailing public opinion at the time. The judiciary plays an important function in this process, serving as a guardian of humans rights by actioning in when legal or popular actions infringe upon those rights. By "overrul [ing] a bulk choice", courts ensure that individual liberties, like the right to wed whom one enjoys, are afforded to everyone, not simply the majority.

In referencing previous Supreme Court choices on marital relationship equality, Boies highlights the judiciary's proactive function in supporting constitutional principles against majority sentiments that may be inequitable. This dynamic shows a balance between democratic governance and constitutional securities, making sure that society advances towards greater inclusivity and justice for all its members.