"The vision that the founding fathers had of rule of law and equality before the law and no one above the law, that is a very viable vision, but instead of that, we have quasi mob rule"

In the quote by James Bovard, he contrasts the designated concepts of governance laid down by the founding daddies of a country-- probably describing the United States-- with the present state of its political or social systems. This analysis centers on the concept of the "guideline of law" as envisioned by the founding fathers. This principle is based on the concept that the law uses equally to all people, regardless of their status or power, making sure fairness and justice. It recommends that no one is above the law and everybody is equivalent before it.

Bovard is highlighting this vision as "extremely practical," implying that it is not just optimistic but also obtainable and functional as a structure for governance. Making use of "practical" suggests that such a system is positive and capable of ushering in justice and social consistency if abided by authentically.

However, Bovard argues that the reality deviates starkly from this vision with the presence of "quasi mob rule." This expression recommends a troubling shift towards governance characterized by lawlessness or choices driven by popular pressure instead of legal procedure and judicial fairness. "Quasi" here shows that it isn't full-fledged mob guideline, but there are components or tendencies of it affecting present governance. This might indicate decisions and policies swayed by popular viewpoint, loud majority minority groups, or emotional persuasion rather of grounded in law and concept, preventing the checks and balances initially designed to secure private rights and freedoms.

In essence, Bovard's statement critiques contemporary social or governmental practices, recommending they fall short of the founding concepts where the law is implied to be unbiased and supreme. His words require a reflection on these fundamental worths and a reevaluation of current practices to make sure that law and justice serve all individuals equitably rather than being manipulated by social or political pressures.