"There can be no peace in the world so long as a large proportion of the population lack the necessities of life and believe that a change of the political and economic system will make them available. World peace must be based on world plenty"
About this Quote
Peace, in John Boyd Orr's formulation, isn't a hymn or a handshake; it's a supply chain. The line reads like a moral claim, but its real force is strategic: deprivation is not just suffering, it's a destabilizing theory of politics. Orr ties conflict to a combustible pairing - material lack plus the belief that another system could fix it. Hunger by itself is tragic; hunger with an imaginable alternative becomes revolutionary fuel. That is the quiet provocation in his wording: ideology spreads fastest where the pantry is empty.
The quote lands in the mid-century moment when "world peace" was being rebranded from a utopian slogan into an administrative project. Orr, a nutrition scientist turned statesman and the first head of the UN Food and Agriculture Organization, is speaking from a postwar landscape defined by rationing, reconstruction, and the rising Cold War. His warning about people who "believe that a change of the political and economic system will make them available" is a thinly veiled nod to socialism and communism gaining credibility amid scarcity. He doesn't argue against those systems on principle; he tries to undercut their appeal by changing the material conditions that make them persuasive.
"World plenty" is also a rhetorical pivot away from charity toward entitlement. It's not about occasional relief; it's about a baseline of security robust enough to make politics boring again. Orr's intent is to turn peace into an economic metric: if you want fewer wars, stop treating food, housing, and health as optional.
The quote lands in the mid-century moment when "world peace" was being rebranded from a utopian slogan into an administrative project. Orr, a nutrition scientist turned statesman and the first head of the UN Food and Agriculture Organization, is speaking from a postwar landscape defined by rationing, reconstruction, and the rising Cold War. His warning about people who "believe that a change of the political and economic system will make them available" is a thinly veiled nod to socialism and communism gaining credibility amid scarcity. He doesn't argue against those systems on principle; he tries to undercut their appeal by changing the material conditions that make them persuasive.
"World plenty" is also a rhetorical pivot away from charity toward entitlement. It's not about occasional relief; it's about a baseline of security robust enough to make politics boring again. Orr's intent is to turn peace into an economic metric: if you want fewer wars, stop treating food, housing, and health as optional.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|---|
| Source | John Boyd Orr — Nobel Peace Prize lecture (1949). Contains the lines: "There can be no peace in the world so long as a large proportion of the population lack the necessities of life... World peace must be based on world plenty." |
More Quotes by John
Add to List





