"There can be no security where there is fear"
About this Quote
Security isn’t just locks and laws; it’s a psychological climate. Frankfurter’s line lands like a rebuke to the political habit of calling repression “safety.” If people are afraid of the state, of their neighbors, of being watched or punished for what they say, then the thing we label “security” becomes a costume worn by power, not a condition lived by citizens.
As a Supreme Court justice shaped by the anxieties of the first half of the 20th century, Frankfurter is speaking from a period when “security” rhetoric routinely justified intrusive policing, loyalty tests, surveillance, and the squeezing of dissent. The subtext is pointed: fear may produce compliance, but it can’t produce stability. A society governed by fear doesn’t become orderly; it becomes brittle. People self-censor, institutions rot from the inside, and trust, the invisible infrastructure of public life, collapses.
The sentence also has a judicial restraint baked into it. Frankfurter often warned against courts becoming roving moral arbiters, yet he understood that constitutional democracy requires more than formal procedures. It requires a baseline freedom from intimidation. “No security” reads less like idealism than like a diagnosis: fear invites overreaction, and overreaction breeds more fear. The cycle is politically useful, legally corrosive, and ultimately self-defeating. In seven words, Frankfurter flips the script: the real threat to security isn’t too much liberty; it’s the manufacture of fear in liberty’s name.
As a Supreme Court justice shaped by the anxieties of the first half of the 20th century, Frankfurter is speaking from a period when “security” rhetoric routinely justified intrusive policing, loyalty tests, surveillance, and the squeezing of dissent. The subtext is pointed: fear may produce compliance, but it can’t produce stability. A society governed by fear doesn’t become orderly; it becomes brittle. People self-censor, institutions rot from the inside, and trust, the invisible infrastructure of public life, collapses.
The sentence also has a judicial restraint baked into it. Frankfurter often warned against courts becoming roving moral arbiters, yet he understood that constitutional democracy requires more than formal procedures. It requires a baseline freedom from intimidation. “No security” reads less like idealism than like a diagnosis: fear invites overreaction, and overreaction breeds more fear. The cycle is politically useful, legally corrosive, and ultimately self-defeating. In seven words, Frankfurter flips the script: the real threat to security isn’t too much liberty; it’s the manufacture of fear in liberty’s name.
Quote Details
| Topic | Fear |
|---|
More Quotes by Felix
Add to List






