"There is no bad in good"
About this Quote
A clergyman’s line this blunt is meant to land like a stone in the pocket: heavy, undeniable, and a little irritating. "There is no bad in good" refuses the comforting religious habit of qualifying itself. No "mostly", no "in the end", no "from a certain point of view". Horton is drawing a hard border in an era when American Protestantism was wrestling with modernity, psychology, and the moral grayness exposed by two world wars. The sentence reads like a corrective to sophistication.
Its specific intent is pastoral and polemical at once. Pastoral, because it offers moral clarity to people exhausted by compromise: goodness is not a cocktail of virtues and hidden toxins; it is clean water. Polemical, because it implicitly attacks a common rationalization: the urge to baptize harm as necessary, strategic, or character-building. If something contains "bad", Horton suggests, it may be useful, inevitable, even excusable, but it isn’t good. That’s a theological line with sharp ethical consequences.
The subtext is a warning about moral alchemy. Humans love to smuggle cruelty inside a noble wrapper - discipline, justice, duty, righteousness. Horton’s phrasing blocks that move. It also pushes back against the pious cynicism that treats every virtue as disguised self-interest. By asserting goodness as unadulterated, he defends the possibility of sanctity in a culture increasingly fluent in suspicion.
Of course, the line is also a provocation: it invites the listener to interrogate their "good" and ask what’s been mixed in. That discomfort is the point.
Its specific intent is pastoral and polemical at once. Pastoral, because it offers moral clarity to people exhausted by compromise: goodness is not a cocktail of virtues and hidden toxins; it is clean water. Polemical, because it implicitly attacks a common rationalization: the urge to baptize harm as necessary, strategic, or character-building. If something contains "bad", Horton suggests, it may be useful, inevitable, even excusable, but it isn’t good. That’s a theological line with sharp ethical consequences.
The subtext is a warning about moral alchemy. Humans love to smuggle cruelty inside a noble wrapper - discipline, justice, duty, righteousness. Horton’s phrasing blocks that move. It also pushes back against the pious cynicism that treats every virtue as disguised self-interest. By asserting goodness as unadulterated, he defends the possibility of sanctity in a culture increasingly fluent in suspicion.
Of course, the line is also a provocation: it invites the listener to interrogate their "good" and ask what’s been mixed in. That discomfort is the point.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|
More Quotes by Douglas
Add to List







