"There is no question that Taiwan is a state in any political science definition of a state"

The quote by William Kirby, "There is no question that Taiwan is a state in any government definition of a state," asserts Taiwan's status as a state when evaluated versus the standard requirements utilized in political science. This assertion welcomes analysis through the lens of political theory and international relations to understand its implications.

In government, the principle of a "state" is typically specified by the Montevideo Convention (1933), which notes 4 main criteria: a permanent population, a defined territory, a government, and the capacity to enter into relations with other states. Kirby's declaration suggests that Taiwan meets these requirements adequately.

First of all, Taiwan has a permanent population of over 23 million individuals who relate to an unique national identity. Second of all, it possesses a defined area, making up the island of Taiwan and numerous smaller islands. This area is under the control and administration of the federal government seated in Taipei, demonstrating de facto sovereignty.

Third, Taiwan keeps a practical federal government with established organizations such as a presidency, legislature, and judiciary. It carries out domestic and worldwide affairs independently of any other nation, especially China, in spite of the latter's claims over Taiwan.

The 4th requirement, the capability to enter into relations with other states, is the most controversial due to Taiwan's distinct global circumstance. While Taiwan functions like an independent state, developing diplomatic and trade relations with various countries and being a member of worldwide organizations (albeit often under uncertain or non-sovereign classifications), its international recognition is restricted. Just a small number of countries officially acknowledge Taiwan as a separate sovereign state, mostly due to push from the People's Republic of China, which demands the One-China Policy.

Kirby's declaration likely highlights that regardless of these diplomatic obstacles, Taiwan's de facto circumstance lines up with the political science meaning of a state. This highlights the intricate interplay in between legal acknowledgment, political realities, and diplomatic relations in figuring out statehood in the contemporary international system.