"There's only so much you can do with an attorney on a show that's about New York policemen"
About this Quote
The quote by Sherry Stringfield, "There's just so much you can do with a lawyer on a show that has to do with New York police officers", reflects a poignant observation about the constraints and challenges of specific functions within the context of tv storytelling, particularly in procedural dramas focused on law enforcement.
Stringfield's comment underscores the hierarchical dynamics and narrative top priorities common within the genre she describes. Authorities dramas generally center around officers, investigators, and their day-to-day experiences as they resolve crimes, delve into investigations, and maintain public safety. The focus is mostly on the action, tension, and ethical concerns encountered by these characters, whose stories are woven around their interactions with lawbreakers, victims, and occasionally, the justice system.
In this light, the function of a lawyer becomes auxiliary. Though crucial in real-life criminal justice processes, attorneys in police dramas often serve a helpful or adversarial function, appearing during courtroom scenes or brief assessments. Their function is directly specified compared to the multi-faceted, vibrant lives of authorities workers. Hence, Stringfield highlights a restraint: while lawyers can contribute to plot development and offer critical legal perspectives, their presence is generally framed by the police-centric story arcs.
Another analysis might be recognizing the standard limits between different legal system individuals in storytelling. Television typically simplifies complex real-world operations into absorbable stories. As an outcome, character development for attorneys might be limited, decreasing their participation to particular moments that even more the police story instead of exploring their independent narrative arcs. These restrictions leave less room for delving deeply into their personal difficulties, ethical problems, or development compared to the more physically and mentally noticeable journeys of police characters.
Stringfield's insight shows a broader commentary on tv's depiction of expert roles, highlighting the requirement to stabilize character variety and depth while adhering to genre expectations. It speaks with the more comprehensive discourse on storytelling and character exploration within media productions, inviting creators to reimagine functions and broaden narrative borders.
About the Author