"They're all focusing on how John Roberts is going to decide Roe v. Wade. That isn't even the right question. I don't even know of a case in the (court) system that addresses it"

In this quote, Jay Alan Sekulow, a popular lawyer known for his deal with constitutional law and religious liberties, addresses a popular misconception surrounding the function of U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts concerning the landmark decision Roe v. Wade. The quote reveals a nuanced understanding of the judicial procedure and the current status of abortion-related cases in the judicial system.

Sekulow is underscoring that the general public and media typically oversimplify complicated legal choices by associating them to specific justices, in this circumstances, Chief Justice Roberts. The focus on how Roberts may "decide" Roe v. Wade recommends a misconception of how the Supreme Court runs. Specific justices do not unilaterally make choices; rather, they belong to a collective body that deliberates and rules on cases brought before it.

Sekulow also highlights that the central concern isn't simply about how one justice may view Roe v. Wade however rather whether an active case that directly challenges or resolves the choice is even present in the court system. At the time of his statement, he indicates that no such case is making its way through the judicial procedure, thereby making it premature to speculate about the court's decision on Roe v. Wade, particularly in relation to Chief Justice Roberts' potential impact.

This quote reveals Sekulow's intent to move the conversation from speculative opinions on private justices to a more grounded understanding of the judicial process. It points to the significance of understanding the status of appropriate cases and recognizing that modifications in precedent require more than just the leanings of a singular justice or a perceived ideological shift within the court. Additionally, it underscores the complexity of the judiciary and the procedural steps involved before landmark choices like Roe v. Wade can be revisited or reversed.