"This enemy of peace in the world today is unlike any we have seen in the past, and our military is learning from, and building on, previous successes while carrying peace and freedom into the future"
About this Quote
“This enemy of peace” is a politician’s Swiss Army knife: vague enough to fit any threat, solemn enough to demand agreement, and morally loaded enough to pre-empt dissent. Kennedy’s phrasing doesn’t identify an adversary so much as manufacture a category - an abstract villain that can be updated as circumstances change. By making the enemy “unlike any we have seen,” the line performs a familiar post-9/11 move: it frames the present as unprecedented, which quietly lowers the bar for extraordinary measures. If the danger is new, then old constraints can be treated as obsolete.
The second half is where the real political work happens. “Learning from, and building on, previous successes” is a reassurance aimed at war-weariness: it invokes competence and continuity without naming the “successes” (or the costs) that would invite debate. It’s a rhetorical hedge that borrows credibility from the past while keeping specifics safely out of frame. The military isn’t just acting; it’s evolving, adapting, getting smarter - a narrative designed to neutralize accusations of repeating mistakes.
“Carrying peace and freedom into the future” completes the moral alchemy. Military force becomes a delivery system for virtue, with “peace” and “freedom” positioned as cargo rather than contested outcomes. The subtext is permission: support the mission because the mission is definitionally good. Contextually, this kind of language thrives when policymakers need public backing for open-ended engagement - a speech built less to inform than to align, converting uncertainty into resolve by wrapping strategy in destiny.
The second half is where the real political work happens. “Learning from, and building on, previous successes” is a reassurance aimed at war-weariness: it invokes competence and continuity without naming the “successes” (or the costs) that would invite debate. It’s a rhetorical hedge that borrows credibility from the past while keeping specifics safely out of frame. The military isn’t just acting; it’s evolving, adapting, getting smarter - a narrative designed to neutralize accusations of repeating mistakes.
“Carrying peace and freedom into the future” completes the moral alchemy. Military force becomes a delivery system for virtue, with “peace” and “freedom” positioned as cargo rather than contested outcomes. The subtext is permission: support the mission because the mission is definitionally good. Contextually, this kind of language thrives when policymakers need public backing for open-ended engagement - a speech built less to inform than to align, converting uncertainty into resolve by wrapping strategy in destiny.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Mark
Add to List









